Informant-based assessment instruments for dementia and their measurement properties in persons with intellectual disability: systematic review protocol

被引:6
|
作者
Zeilinger, Elisabeth L. [1 ]
Komenda, Sophie [1 ]
Zrnic, Irina [1 ]
Franken, Fabian [2 ]
Woditschka, Katharina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Psychol Hsch Berlin, Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Cologne, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 12期
关键词
mental health; old age psychiatry; statistics & research methods; dementia; OLDER-ADULTS; PEOPLE; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040920
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Persons with intellectual disability (ID) are at a higher risk of developing dementia than persons without ID, with an expected earlier onset. Assessment methods for the general population cannot be applied for persons with ID due to their pre-existing intellectual and functional impairments. As there is no agreed-upon measure to assess dementia in persons with ID, multiple instruments for this purpose have been developed and adapted in the past decades. This review aimed to identify all available informant-based instruments for the assessment of dementia in persons with ID, to evaluate and compare them according to their measurement properties, and to provide a recommendation for the most suitable instruments. Additionally, an overview of the amount and quality of research on these instruments will be provided. Methods and analysis This review will be conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We will adhere to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines and use a set of characteristics developed for assessment instruments for persons with ID, the Characteristics of Assessment Instruments for Psychiatric Disorders in Persons with Intellectual Developmental Disorders. Two comprehensive, systematic literature searches will be applied in 10 international databases, including ASSIA, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, OpenGrey and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Risk of bias and quality assessment will be done according to COSMIN guidelines. We will apply the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rate the overall quality of the available evidence. Ethics and dissemination No ethics statement is needed for this study. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Informant-based assessment instruments for dementia in people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and standardised evaluation
    Zeilinger, Elisabeth L.
    Zrnic Novakovic, Irina
    Komenda, Sophie
    Franken, Fabian
    Sobisch, Marc
    Mayer, Anna-Maria
    Neumann, Lennart C.
    Loosli, Sandra, V
    Hoare, Sarah
    Pietschnig, Jakob
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2022, 121
  • [2] A systematic review on assessment instruments for dementia in persons with intellectual disabilities
    Zeilinger, Elisabeth L.
    Stiehl, Katharina A. M.
    Weber, Germain
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2013, 34 (11) : 3962 - 3977
  • [3] Informant-based screening tools for dementia: an overview of systematic reviews
    Taylor-Rowan, Martin
    Nafisi, Sara
    Owen, Rhiannon
    Duffy, Robyn
    Patel, Amit
    Burton, Jennifer K.
    Quinn, Terence J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (02) : 580 - 589
  • [4] An Informant-Based Simple Questionnaire for Visuospatial Dysfunction Assessment in Dementia
    Wang, Ching-Tsu
    Hung, Guang-Uei
    Wei, Cheng-Yu
    Tzeng, Ray-Chang
    Chiu, Pai-Yi
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [5] Informant-based screening tools for diagnosis of dementia, an overview of systematic reviews of test accuracy studies protocol
    Taylor-Rowan, Martin
    Nafisi, Sara
    Patel, Amit
    Burton, Jennifer K.
    Quinn, Terry J.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [6] Informant-based screening tools for diagnosis of dementia, an overview of systematic reviews of test accuracy studies protocol
    Martin Taylor-Rowan
    Sara Nafisi
    Amit Patel
    Jennifer K. Burton
    Terry J. Quinn
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [7] ASSESSMENT OF DEMENTIA IN A CLINICAL SAMPLE OF PERSONS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY
    Roesner, P.
    Berger, J.
    Tarasova, D.
    Birkner, J.
    Kaiser, H.
    Diefenbacher, A.
    Sappok, T.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2021, 65 (08) : 731 - 731
  • [8] Assessment of dementia in a clinical sample of persons with intellectual disability
    Roesner, Peggy
    Berger, Justus
    Tarasova, Daria
    Birkner, Joana
    Kaiser, Heika
    Diefenbacher, Albert
    Sappok, Tanja
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (06) : 1618 - 1629
  • [9] Assessment of Drug-Associated Extrapyramidal Symptoms in People With Intellectual Disability: A Comparison of an Informant-Based Scale With Clinical Rating Scales
    de Kuijper, Gerda M.
    Hoekstra, Pieter J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 36 (05) : 508 - 512
  • [10] The Alzheimer's Questionnaire (AQ): A Pilot Study for a New Informant-Based Dementia Assessment
    Malek-Ahmadi, M.
    Kataria, R.
    Belden, C.
    Connor, D.
    Pearson, C.
    Jacobson, S.
    Yaari, R.
    Singh, U.
    Sabbagh, M.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (06) : 481 - 481