Global land grab: Toward a country typology for future land negotiations

被引:12
|
作者
Petrescu, Dacinia Crina [1 ,2 ]
Hartel, Tibor [3 ,4 ]
Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina [5 ]
机构
[1] Babes Bolyai Univ, Fac Business, 7 Horea St, Cluj Napoca 400174, Romania
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Dept Mkt Innovat & Org, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Babes Bolyai Univ, Hungarian Dept Biol & Ecol, 5-7 Clinicilor St, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[4] Babes Bolyai Univ, Ctr Syst Biol Biodivers & Bioresources, 5-7 Clinicilor St, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[5] Babes Bolyai Univ, Fac Environm Sci & Engn, 30 Fantanele St, Cluj Napoca 400294, Romania
关键词
Land deals; Negotiations; Land grabbing; Country characteristics; Land Matrix; AGRICULTURAL LAND; FOOD; CONSERVATION; SECURITY; DEALS; CONSULTATION; ACQUISITIONS; INVESTMENTS; GOVERNANCE; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104960
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Human creativity opens new ways for the fulfillment of needs. It becomes increasingly difficult to predict which resources will be hunted and which will become unattractive. Even so, the conquest of new lands remains a dominant hallmark of all societies, regardless of technological advancements or human rights recognition. Access to and use of natural resources often cause conflicts, especially due to competing interests. In this context, the design of coping strategies is a difficult task. The present study aims to advance the understanding of how the outcome of large land negotiations at the global level is influenced by country characteristics. Consequently, the paper explores the relationship between the number and size of land transactions (between 2000 and 2018) at a global level and the socialeconomic and environmental features of 84 countries. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to understand the patterns of variation within the data describing country features. PCA resulted in four principal components used to define four types of countries: "Development", "Size", "Water resources", and "Agriculture". Results evidenced that the indicators for the "Development" country-type negatively predicted the number and size of failed deals and that the indicators for the "Size" country-type significantly influenced every contract type. Overall, this contribution reveals the cases in which the social-economic and environmental profile of the country can predict the type of contracts related to land grabbing and also their size and number. From a practical perspective, the results can serve as a knowledge framework that enhances negotiators' power in future land bargaining.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land Regularization in Brazil and the Global Land Grab
    Oliveira, Gustavo de L. T.
    DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2013, 44 (02) : 261 - 283
  • [2] Governing the Global Land Grab
    Kapstein, Ethan B.
    GLOBAL POLICY, 2018, 9 (02) : 173 - 183
  • [3] The Future of Land-Grab Universities
    McCoy, Meredith
    Risam, Roopika
    Guiliano, Jennifer
    NAIS-NATIVE AMERICAN AND INDIGENOUS STUDIES ASSOCIATION, 2021, 8 (01): : 169 - 175
  • [4] The Global Land Grab: Beyond the Hype
    Nagpal, Sugandha
    PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2016, 16 (02) : 224 - 225
  • [5] The Global Land Grab: Beyond the hype
    Unwin, Tim
    Holloway, Royal
    GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 100 : 60 - 60
  • [6] Food, Fuel, and the Global Land Grab
    Brown, Lester R.
    FUTURIST, 2013, 47 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [7] The global land grab: beyond the hype
    Amanor, Kojo
    JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2017, 44 (02): : 506 - 509
  • [8] Land grab
    Weinberg, N
    FORBES, 2000, 165 (10): : 144 - +
  • [9] Land grab
    不详
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2004, 102 (33) : 30 - 30
  • [10] Land Grab
    Burke, Monte
    FORBES, 2011, 187 (05): : 26 - +