A KNOWLEDGE TAXONOMY IN THE CONTEXT OF ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES: an study in a public university

被引:0
|
作者
Silva, Sergio Evangelista [1 ]
Reis, Luciana Paula [1 ]
Sester Pereira, Alana Deusilan [1 ]
Fernandes, June Marques
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
关键词
Znowledge taxonomy; Knowledge management techniques; Grounded theory; MANAGEMENT; HEURISTICS; ASSETS; RULES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Knowledge is one of the most important assets in organizations. While there are several studies about knowledge management, there are few texts dedicated to classifying the existing types of knowledge. As such, the concept of knowledge is overlooked in the literature. Hence, this situation poses a dilemma: how could a thing that is not well understood be adequately managed? Drawing on current knowledge taxonomies and the organizational routines concept, we address this gap by outlining a taxonomy of how knowledge is manifested in the execution and structuration of organizational routines. This taxonomy is generated through the grounding process of examining the organizational routines of an academic department in a public university. As the main result, it was identified four basic types of knowledge: stable-reproducible, problem-solving, incremental-shift, and paradigmatic-shift. As main theoretical contribution, this paper introduces a knowledge taxonomy, which is an alternative view in relation to the current taxonomies. As a practical implication, these four types of knowledge presented point out to the necessity of the development of specific knowledge management practices for each type of knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 218
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Organizational culture and knowledge management processes: case study in a public university
    Adeinat, Iman M.
    Abdulfatah, Fatheia H.
    VINE JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 49 (01) : 35 - 53
  • [2] ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES AND CONTEXT ALTERATION: A RECONCILIATION
    Stanczyk-Hugiet, Ewa
    Piorkowska, Katarzyna
    Stanczyk, Sylwia
    ARGUMENTA OECONOMICA, 2017, 39 (02): : 341 - 371
  • [3] Stimulating Knowledge Search Routines and Architecture Competences: The Role of Organizational Context and Middle Management
    Tippmann, Esther
    Scott, Pamela Sharkey
    Mangematin, Vincent
    LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2014, 47 (04) : 206 - 223
  • [4] The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context
    Howard-Grenville, JA
    ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (06) : 618 - 636
  • [5] Organizational Routines and Digital Transformation: An Analysis of How Organizational Routines Impact Digital Transformation Transition in a Saudi University
    Almatrodi, Ibrahim
    Skoumpopoulou, Dimitra
    SYSTEMS, 2023, 11 (05):
  • [6] Determinants of practices knowledge management: structure in the context of the Public University
    da Costa, Wenyka Preston Leite Batista
    da Silva, Jandeson Dantas
    Silva, Sergio Luiz Pedrosa
    REVISTA DE GESTAO E SECRETARIADO-GESEC, 2023, 14 (04): : 5697 - 5716
  • [7] An empirical study on the influence of organizational and technological aspects on the knowledge sharing behaviour in the Vietnam's university context
    Anh Tuan Pham
    Ngoc Thang Nguyen
    Dang Minh Nguyen
    Thi Phuong Anh Tran
    IFKAD 2014: 9TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT MODELS FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, 2014, : 359 - 379
  • [8] Organizational context and knowledge acquisition in IJVs: An empirical study
    Evangelista, Felicitas
    Le Nguyen Hau
    JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2009, 44 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [9] Organizational context and taxonomy of health care databases
    Shatin, D
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2001, 10 (05) : 367 - 371
  • [10] An exploration of contemporary organizational artifacts and routines in a sustainable excellence context
    Carayannis, Elias G.
    Grigoroudis, Evangelos
    Del Giudice, Manlio
    Della Peruta, Maria Rosaria
    Sindakis, Stavros
    JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 21 (01) : 35 - 56