Cluster randomized controlled trial of volitional and motivational interventions to improve bowel cancer screening uptake: A population-level study

被引:5
|
作者
Wilding, Sarah [1 ]
Tsipa, Anastasia [1 ]
Branley-Bell, Dawn [1 ,2 ]
Greenwood, Darren C. [3 ,4 ]
Vargas-Palacios, Armando [5 ,6 ]
Yaziji, Nahel [5 ]
Addison, Caroline [7 ]
Kelly, Phil [7 ]
Day, Fiona [8 ,9 ]
Horsfall, Kate [10 ]
Conner, Mark [1 ]
O'Connor, Daryl B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Psychol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Psychol, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Data Analyt, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Leeds, Acad Unit Hlth Econ, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Anahuac Mexico Campus Norte, Ctr Invest Ciencias Salud, FCS, Naucalpan De Juarez, Mexico
[7] Gateshead Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Bowel Canc Screening Programme North East Hub, Gateshead, England
[8] Leeds City Council, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[9] Leeds West Clin Commissioning Grp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[10] NHS England & NHS Improvement North East & Yorksh, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Bowel cancer screening; Colorectal cancer screening; Behavior change intervention; Brief intervention; Implementation intention intervention; Volitional behavior change intervention; IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS; HELP SHEET;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113496
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide, although effective uptake of bowel cancer screening is below 60% in England. This trial investigated the influence of volitional and motivational interventions and their combination on increasing guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) screening uptake. Method. In total, 34,633 participants were recruited (via North-East of England bowel cancer screening hub) into a 2x2 factorial cluster randomized controlled trial. Social norm-based motivational intervention (SNA); Implementation intention-based Volitional Help Sheet (VHS); Combined intervention (SNA+VHS); Treatment as usual control. Screening rate (gFOBT kit return rate within 8 weeks of invitation) was the primary outcome. Results. Screening kits were returned by 60% of participants (N=20,847/34,633). A substantial imbalance was observed in participant characteristics, participants in the combined intervention group were younger and more likely to be first time invitees. Adjusted analyses found insufficient evidence that any of the interventions were different to control (Combined: OR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.97-1.44; SNA alone: OR=0.93; 95% CI: 0.76-1.15; VHS alone OR= 0.88; 95% CI: 0.75-1.03). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a significant beneficial effect of the combined intervention in the youngest age group compared to control (OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.051.54). Conclusions. The study did not support any benefit of either VHS or SNA interventions alone on bowel cancer screening uptake. The combined SNA+VHS intervention was significantly different from control only in the youngest age group in adjusted analyses. However, the magnitude of effect in the youngest age group suggests that further testing of VHS plus SNA interventions in carefully targeted populations may be warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomised controlled trial of volitional and motivational interventions to improve cervical cancer screening uptake
    Wilding, Sarah
    Wighton, Sarah
    West, Robert
    Conner, Mark
    O'Connor, Daryl B.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2023, 322
  • [2] Financial incentives and motivational intervention to improve gastric cancer screening in China: a randomized controlled trial study protocol
    Wang, Quan
    Gong, Chao
    Lv, Yumeng
    Tan, Yiyang
    Liu, Siqi
    Yang, Li
    BMJ SURGERY INTERVENTIONS & HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 6 (01)
  • [3] Strategy for power calculation for interactions: Application to a trial of interventions to improve uptake of bowel cancer screening
    Brentnall, A. R.
    Duffy, S. W.
    Baio, G.
    Raine, R.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2012, 33 (01) : 213 - 217
  • [4] Expanding population-level interventions to help more low-income smokers quit: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Wolff, Jennifer M.
    McQueen, Amy
    Garg, Rachel
    Thompson, Tess
    Fu, Qiang
    Brown, Derek S.
    Kegler, Michelle
    Carpenter, Kelly M.
    Kreuter, Matthew W.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2023, 129
  • [5] Structured Lifestyle Modification Interventions Involving Frontline Health Workers for Population-Level Blood Pressure Reduction: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India (DISHA Study)
    Kondal, Dimple
    Jeemon, Panniyammakal
    Manimunda, Sathyaprakash
    Narayanan, Gitanjali
    Purty, Anil Jacob
    Negi, Prakash Chand
    Ladhani, Sulaiman Sadruddin
    Sanghvi, Jyoti
    Singh, Kuldeep
    Deshpande, Ajit
    Sobti, Nidhi
    Toteja, Gurudayal Singh
    Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2022, 11 (06):
  • [6] Adapted motivational interviewing to improve the uptake of treatment for glaucoma in Nigeria: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Abdull, Mohammed M.
    Gilbert, Clare
    McCambridge, Jim
    Evans, Jennifer
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [7] Adapted motivational interviewing to improve the uptake of treatment for glaucoma in Nigeria: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Mohammed M Abdull
    Clare Gilbert
    Jim McCambridge
    Jennifer Evans
    Trials, 15
  • [8] Educational Interventions to Improve Screening Mammography Interpretation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Geller, Berta M.
    Bogart, Andy
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Smith, Robert
    Monsees, Barbara
    Bassett, Lawrence W.
    Buist, Diana M.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Onega, Tracy
    Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
    Haneuse, Sebastien
    Hill, Deirdre
    Wallis, Matthew G.
    Miglioretti, Diana
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (06) : W586 - W596
  • [9] PROACTIVE TOBACCO TREATMENT AND POPULATION-LEVEL CESSATION: A PRAGMATIC RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Fu, Steven
    van Ryn, Michelle
    Sherman, Scott
    Burgess, Diana
    Noorbaloochi, Siamak
    Clothier, Barbara
    Taylor, Brent C.
    Joseph, Anne
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 : S158 - S159
  • [10] Estimation of Cost for Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in a High-Risk Population in Rural China: Results from a Population-Level Randomized Controlled Trial
    Fuxiao Li
    Xiang Li
    Chuanhai Guo
    Ruiping Xu
    Fenglei Li
    Yaqi Pan
    Mengfei Liu
    Zhen Liu
    Chao Shi
    Hui Wang
    Minmin Wang
    Hongrui Tian
    Fangfang Liu
    Ying Liu
    Jingjing Li
    Hong Cai
    Li Yang
    Zhonghu He
    Yang Ke
    PharmacoEconomics, 2019, 37 : 819 - 827