Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: Evidence from ROC curves

被引:40
|
作者
Heathcote, Andrew
Raymond, Frances
Dunn, John
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Psychol, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
recognition memory; list discrimination; receiver operating characteristic; signal detection theory; memory models;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.001
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Does recognition memory rely on discrete recollection, continuous evidence, or both? Is continuous evidence sensitive to only the recency and duration of study (familiarity), or is it also sensitive to details of the study episode? Dual process theories assume recognition is based on recollection and familiarity, with only recollection providing knowledge about study details. Single process theories assume a single continuous evidence dimension that can provide information about familiarity and details. We replicated list (Yonelinas, 1994) and plural (Rotello, Macmillan, & Van Tassel, 2000) discrimination experiments requiring knowledge of details to discriminate targets from similar non-targets. We also ran modified versions of these experiments aiming to increase recollection by removing non-targets that could be discriminated by familiarity alone. Single process models provided the best trade-off between goodness-of-fit and model complexity and dual process models were able to account for the data only when they incorporated continuous evidence sensitive to details. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 514
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory
    Juola, James F.
    Caballero-Sanz, Alexandra
    Munoz-Garcia, Adrian R.
    Botella, Juan
    Suero, Manuel
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2019, 47 (04) : 855 - 876
  • [2] Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory
    James F. Juola
    Alexandra Caballero-Sanz
    Adrián R. Muñoz-García
    Juan Botella
    Manuel Suero
    Memory & Cognition, 2019, 47 : 855 - 876
  • [3] ROC in animals: Uncovering the neural substrates of recollection and familiarity in episodic recognition memory
    Sauvage, Magdalena M.
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2010, 19 (03) : 816 - 828
  • [4] Is there a Recognition Memory Deficit in Parkinson's Disease? Evidence from Estimates of Recollection and Familiarity
    Weiermann, Brigitte
    Stephan, Marianne A.
    Kaelin-Lang, Alain
    Meier, Beat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 120 (03) : 211 - 216
  • [5] A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory
    Julie J. Neiworth
    Madeline E. Thall
    Shannon Liu
    Ellie Leon-Moffly
    Moira Rankin
    Madeline A. LoRusso
    Suhani Thandi
    John Garay-Hernandez
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [6] A recognition test in monkeys to differentiate recollection from familiarity memory
    Neiworth, Julie J.
    Thall, Madeline E.
    Liu, Shannon
    Leon-Moffly, Ellie
    Rankin, Moira
    Lorusso, Madeline A.
    Thandi, Suhani
    Garay-Hernandez, John
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [7] Does context discriminate recollection from familiarity in recognition memory?
    Perfect, TJ
    Mayes, AR
    Downes, JJ
    VanEijk, R
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (03): : 797 - 813
  • [8] Survival Processing in Recognition Memory: Separating Recollection From Familiarity
    Cho, Kit W.
    Kazanas, Stephanie A.
    Altarriba, Jeanette
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 131 (01): : 19 - 32
  • [9] Assessing the Dissociability of Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory
    Pratte, Michael S.
    Rouder, Jeffrey N.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2012, 38 (06) : 1591 - 1607
  • [10] Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory
    Mark M. Kishiyama
    Andrew P. Yonelinas
    Memory & Cognition, 2003, 31 : 1045 - 1051