Impact of clinical decision support on oritavancin prescribing in the emergency department

被引:2
|
作者
Treu, Cierra N. [1 ]
Cheon, Eunah [1 ]
Wu, Gary [1 ]
Horowitz, Harold W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NewYork Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hosp, Pharm Dept, 506 6th St, Brooklyn, NY 11215 USA
[2] NewYork Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hosp, Dept Med, Infect Dis, Brooklyn, NY USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Med, Clin Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.japh.2020.11.001
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations from skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) have been on the rise and have led to an increased clinical and economic burden. Owing to their single-dose regimen, recently approved lipoglycopeptides such as oritavancin have the potential to shift the management of SSTIs from an inpatient to outpatient setting. Limited data exist regarding the use of these drugs in the ED setting. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the impact that clinical decision support (CDS) incorporation into the computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system had on oritavancin use and to assess compliance with appropriate use guidelines in the ED. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients who received oritavancin from September 2016 to May 2018. The patients were assigned to the pre-CDS-implementation group if oritavancin was used between September 13, 2016, and June 28, 2017 and to the post-CDS-implementation group if oritavancin was used between August 28, 2017, and May 25, 2018. There was a 2- month transition period between the 2 study time periods. Patients were excluded if the administration occurred outside of the ED or during the transition period. The primary endpoints were oritavancin use and compliance with the appropriate use guidelines after the implementation. Results: There were 169 oritavancin orders in total, of which 119 met the inclusion criteria. There was a marked decrease in use post-CDS implementation (9.2 orders/mo vs. 3 orders/mo). Among those who were prescribed oritavancin, compliance with the appropriate use guidelines increased; however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: The implementation of the appropriate use guidelines with CDS integration into the CPOE system decreased overall oritavancin use but did not have an impact on compliance with the appropriate use guidelines. (C) 2021 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved antibiotic prescribing using indication-based clinical decision support in the emergency department
    Goss, Foster R.
    Bookman, Kelly
    Barron, Michelle
    Bickley, Daniel
    Landgren, Brady
    Kroehl, Miranda
    Williamson, Kayla
    Zane, Richard
    Wiler, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OPEN, 2020, 1 (03) : 214 - 221
  • [2] The Effect of an Electronic Decision Support Tool on Emergency Department Prescribing of Naloxone
    Kreshak, A. A.
    Tolia, V. M.
    Chan, T. C.
    Powell, R. A.
    Brennan, J. J.
    Killeen, J. P.
    Castillo, E. M.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (04) : S143 - S143
  • [3] Impact of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool for Emergency Department Patients With Pneumonia
    Dean, Nathan C.
    Jones, Barbara E.
    Jones, Jason P.
    Ferraro, Jeffrey P.
    Post, Herman B.
    Aronsky, Dominik
    Vines, Caroline G.
    Allen, Todd L.
    Haug, Peter J.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 66 (05) : 511 - 520
  • [4] Clinical trial of computerized decision support to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing to older emergency department patients
    Terrell, K. M.
    Perkins, A. J.
    Dexter, P. R.
    Callahan, C. M.
    Miller, D. K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2008, 56 (04) : S168 - S169
  • [5] Clinical Decision Support for Antibiotic Stewardship in the Emergency Department
    May, L.
    Morgan, B.
    Matsumoto, C.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (04) : S100 - S100
  • [6] Impact of Predictive Text Clinical Decision Support on Imaging Order Entry in the Emergency Department
    Mattay, Govind S.
    Griffey, Richard T.
    Narra, Vamsi
    Poirier, Robert F.
    Bierhals, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 20 (12) : 1250 - 1257
  • [7] Impact of clinical decision support on controlled substance prescribing
    Rachel B. Seymour
    Meghan K. Wally
    Joseph R. Hsu
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23
  • [8] Impact of clinical decision support on controlled substance prescribing
    Seymour, Rachel B.
    Wally, Meghan K.
    Hsu, Joseph R.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [9] Prognostic clinical decision support for pneumonia in the emergency department: A randomized trial
    Williams, Derek J.
    Nian, Hui
    Suresh, Srinivasan
    Slagle, Jason
    Gradwohl, Stephen
    Johnson, Jakobi
    Stassun, Justine
    Reale, Carrie
    Just, Shari L.
    Rixe, Nancy S.
    Beebe, Russ
    Arnold, Donald H.
    Turer, Robert W.
    Antoon, James W.
    Sartori, Laura F.
    Freundlich, Robert E.
    Grijalva, Carlos G.
    Smith, Joshua C.
    Weitkamp, Asli O.
    Weinger, Matthew B.
    Zhu, Yuwei
    Martin, Judith M.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 19 (09) : 802 - 811
  • [10] Clinical Decision Support Reduces Unnecessary Tetanus Vaccinations in the Emergency Department
    Dutta, Sayon
    McEvoy, Dustin S.
    Stump, Timothy
    McCabe, Jonathan
    Mahendra-Rajah, Anoushka
    McMurry, Reid
    White, Benjamin A.
    Rubins, David
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 78 (03) : 370 - 380