Public acceptability of climate change mitigation policies: a discrete choice experiment

被引:42
|
作者
Scasny, Milan [1 ]
Zverinova, Iva [1 ]
Czajkowski, Mikolaj [2 ]
Kysela, Eva [1 ]
Zagorska, Katarzyna [2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Ctr Environm, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Warsaw, Dept Econ, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Burden sharing; climate change mitigation policy; consumer preferences; cost distribution; discrete choice experiments; GHG emission targets; CONTINGENT VALUATION; NONMARKET VALUATION; SUPPORT; WILLINGNESS; EFFICIENCY; EQUITY; RISK; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; TAXATION;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2016.1248888
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The present study examines the public acceptability of the EU's future climate change mitigation policies. Using the discrete choice experiment, the authors elicit the preferences of approximately 4098 respondents from the Czech Republic, Poland, and UK for the GHG emission reduction policies that differ in four attributes: emission reduction target, burden sharing across the EU Member States, the distribution of costs within each country, and cost. The three specific reduction targets analysed correspond to the EU 2050 Roadmap and deep decarbonization policy (80% target), the climate-energy 2014 targets (40% target), and the status quo policy (20% target); each will result in a specific emission trajectory by 2050. The results reveal stark differences between the three countries. Czechs would be on average willing to pay around EUR 13 per household per month for the 40% GHG emission reductions by 2030 or EUR 17 for 80% reductions by 2050, and the citizens of the UK are willing to pay about EUR 45. Conversely, the mean willingness to pay (WTP) of Polish households for achieving more stringent targets is not statistically different from zero. The WTP for adopting policies to reach the 40% and 80% targets are not statistically different in any of the examined countries. However, it was found that the preferences in all three countries are highly heterogeneous. In addition, an insight is provided into the preferred characteristics of the future GHG emission reduction policies.Policy relevanceA detailed understanding of the acceptability of climate mitigation policies among the general public is crucial for identifying the potential for improvements in their design. This study examines the public acceptability of the EU's future mitigation policies. The authors elicit preferences of respondents from three EU countries for three different emission trajectories and reduction targets through policy packages that include several options to share the burden among the EU Member States and to distribute the costs among citizens of each country. Preferences are analysed for each attribute and the willingness-to-pay values for several alternative policy packages are derived. The authors believe that understanding public acceptability can help support the successful implementation of climate mitigation policies.
引用
收藏
页码:S111 / S130
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Climate change scepticism and public support for mitigation: Evidence from an Australian choice experiment
    Akter, Sonia
    Bennett, Jeff
    Ward, Michael B.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2012, 22 (03): : 736 - 745
  • [2] Does information change public support for climate mitigation policies?
    Dabla-Norris, Era
    Khalid, Salma
    Magistretti, Giacomo
    Sollaci, Alexandre
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2024, 24 (10) : 1474 - 1487
  • [3] Carrot and stick incentive policies for climate change mitigation: A survey experiment on crowding out of public support
    Ling, Maoliang
    Liu, Chutian
    Xu, Lin
    Yang, Haimi
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 223
  • [4] Public preferences for policies promoting a healthy diet: a discrete choice experiment
    Dieteren, C. M.
    Bonfrer, I.
    Brouwer, W. B. F.
    van Exel, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2023, 24 (09): : 1429 - 1440
  • [5] Public preferences for policies promoting a healthy diet: a discrete choice experiment
    C. M. Dieteren
    I. Bonfrer
    W. B. F. Brouwer
    J. van Exel
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2023, 24 : 1429 - 1440
  • [6] Valuing climate change mitigation: A choice experiment on a coastal and marine ecosystem
    Remoundou, Kyriaki
    Diaz-Simal, Pedro
    Koundouri, Phoebe
    Rulleau, Benedicte
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 11 : 87 - 94
  • [7] European Climate Change Perceptions: Public support for mitigation and adaptation policies
    Hagen, Bjoern
    Middel, Ariane
    Pijawka, David
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2016, 26 (03) : 170 - 183
  • [8] Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators
    Shoyama, Kikuko
    Managi, Shunsuke
    Yamagata, Yoshiki
    LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 34 : 282 - 293
  • [9] Climate change mitigation policies and poverty
    Barbier, Edward B.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 5 (04) : 483 - 491
  • [10] Climate change mitigation policies in Lithuania
    Konstantinaviciute, Inga
    2003, SAGE Publications Inc. (14):