Which way is best for stone fragments and dust extraction during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

被引:7
|
作者
Kati, Bulent [1 ]
Pelit, Eyyup Sabri [1 ]
Yagmur, Ismail [1 ]
Akin, Yigit [2 ]
Ciftci, Halil [1 ]
Yeni, Ercan [1 ]
机构
[1] Harran Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Sanliurfa, Turkey
[2] Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Stone fragments; Stone dust; New technique; INSIGNIFICANT RESIDUAL FRAGMENTS; IN-VITRO; LITHOTRIPSY;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-017-0987-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a commonly used type of minimally invasive treatment in kidney stone surgeries. Surgical success is assessed according to residual stone amount after surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare the two methods' success and practicality that are applied after the fracture of the stone in the patients who applied PCNL and which enable the removal of the residual stones. Among 102 patients who underwent a single-session of PCNL at our department between June 2015 and November 2016 were evaluated. Previously identified irrigation method and our aspiration method which described used in post-operative patients divided into two groups of residual fragments was assessed by computed tomography. The results were evaluated in statistical analyses. Significant p was accepted as p < 0.05. The age and gender distribution of patients in the irrigation and aspiration groups did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). In irrigation and aspiration groups, stone size did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). The amount of residue stones and dust remaining in the irrigation group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the aspiration group. Although many methods have been tried before, we think that the aspiration method we have described is a cheaper, more effective and feasible option.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 302
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Which way is best for stone fragments and dust extraction during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Bulent Kati
    Eyyup Sabri Pelit
    Ismail Yagmur
    Yigit Akin
    Halil Ciftci
    Ercan Yeni
    Urolithiasis, 2018, 46 : 297 - 302
  • [3] A Technique to Flush Out Renal Stone Fragments during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Panah, Ali
    Masood, Junaid
    Zaman, Faruquz
    Papatsoris, Athanasios G.
    El-Husseiny, Tamer
    Buchholz, Noor
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [4] Hosseini passive stone fragments collector in percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL)
    Hosseini, mohammad Mehdi
    Ghayumi, Abbas
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A285 - A285
  • [5] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Stone Disease: Which Position? Prone Position!
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Tsaturyan, Arman
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 35 : 6 - 8
  • [6] IMPACT OF RESIDUAL STONE FRAGMENTS ON RISK OF UNPLANNED STONE EVENTS FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
    Zhu, Denzel
    Cheng, Galen
    Carlisi, Christopher
    Doersch, Karen
    Quarrier, Scott O.
    Jain, Rajat K.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E1267 - E1268
  • [7] Impact of Residual Stone Fragments on Risk of Unplanned Stone Events Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Zhu, Denzel
    Mali, Kaela
    Carlisi, Christopher
    Cheng, Galen
    Doersch, Karen M.
    Quarrier, Scott O.
    Jain, Rajat K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2024, 38 (12) : 1380 - 1386
  • [9] The use of stone cone minimizes stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Tan, YH
    Maloney, ME
    Springhart, WP
    L'Esperance, J
    Albala, DM
    Perelman, JD
    Teichman, JM
    Preminger, GM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 3 - 3
  • [10] Use of stone cone minimizes stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Springhart, W. Patrick
    Tan, Yeh Hong
    Albala, David M.
    Perelman, Jason
    Teichman, Joel M.
    Preminger, Glenn M.
    UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (05) : 1066 - 1068