Low-Dose Hypofractionated Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy for Adult Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

被引:12
|
作者
Jeans, Elizabeth B. [1 ]
Hu, Yue-Houng [1 ]
Stish, Bradley J. [1 ]
King, Brian [2 ]
Davis, Mark [2 ]
Harmsen, William S. [3 ]
Fruth, Kristin M. [3 ]
Locher, Sarah E. [1 ]
Deufel, Christopher L. [1 ]
Evans, Jaden D. [1 ,4 ]
Martenson, James A. [1 ]
Lester, Scott C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Dermatol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Intermt Healthcare, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ogden, UT USA
关键词
MYCOSIS-FUNGOIDES; RADIATION-THERAPY; SEZARY-SYNDROME;
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2020.08.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Historically, the standard of care for total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) delivered 30 to 36 Gy over 5 to 10 weeks. Given the high risk of relapse, a majority of patients require additional treatments. Therefore, attempts to use a shortened course of TSEBT have been investigated. Methods and Materials: We conducted a single-institution retrospective review to evaluate disease response, control, and toxicity using a low-dose, hypofractionated course of TSEBT (HTSEBT) in patients with mycosis fungoides. Results: Forty patients received 57 courses of HTSEBT. Median dose (Gy)/fractionation was 12/3, spanning a median time of 2.4 weeks. Overall response rate of patients assessed (n = 54) was 100%. Thirty-one courses (57.4%) resulted in a complete response and 23 courses (42.6%) resulted in a partial response. Cumulative incidence of progressive skin disease at 3 months was 37.2%, at 6 months, 56.9%, and at 1 year, 81.5%. Of the 40 patients treated with a first course of HTSEBT, 31 received subsequent courses of radiotherapy. Cumulative incidence of subsequent treatment was 28.0% at 3 months, 46.8% at 6 months, and 70.0% at 1 year. Patients who underwent repeat courses of HTSEBT continued to have similar treatment responses to repeat courses without increased toxicities. Toxicities from all courses were acceptable with the exception of 1 patient, who experienced grade 4 skin toxicity (moist desquamation requiring hospitalization). Conclusions: Low-dose HTSEBT provides good palliation in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with a satisfactory response and toxicity profile. HTSEBT allows therapy to be completed in far fewer treatments. Low-dose HTSEBT is an appropriate treatment option for patients unable to come for daily treatment. HTSEBT provides a way to decrease exposure to other patients and staff during public health emergencies such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:E529 / E537
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low-dose Hypofractionated Palliative Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy in Adult Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
    Jeans, E.
    King, B.
    Evans, J. D.
    Lester, S. C.
    Stish, B. J.
    Martenson, J. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E482 - E482
  • [2] Hypofractionated Low-Dose Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy for Primary Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Analysis of Efficacy and Toxicity
    Yi, Sofia F.
    Patel, Akshat M.
    Rizvi, Syed M.
    Geethakumari, Praveen Ramakrishnan
    Shah, Jennifer L.
    Desai, Neil B.
    Goff, Heather W.
    Kumar, Kiran A.
    BLOOD, 2021, 138
  • [3] Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy for cutaneous lymphoma
    Kroeger, Kai
    Elsayad, Khaled
    Moustakis, Christos
    Haverkamp, Uwe
    Eich, Hans Theodor
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2017, 193 (12) : 1024 - 1030
  • [4] Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy plus oral bexarotene maintenance therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
    Elsayad, Khaled
    Rolf, Daniel
    Sunderkoetter, Cord
    Weishaupt, Carsten
    Mueller, Elisa Christina
    Nawar, Tarek
    Stranzenbach, Rene
    Livingstone, Elisabeth
    Stadler, Rudolf
    Steinbrink, Kerstin
    Moritz, Rose K. C.
    Eich, Hans Theodor
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2022, 20 (03): : 279 - 285
  • [5] Mogamulizumab and Concomitant Hypofractionated Low-Dose Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy (2 x 4 Gy) in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Proof of Principle, Report of Two Cases
    Oymanns, Mathias
    Daum-Marzian, Michael
    Assaf, Chalid
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (09) : 5412 - 5421
  • [6] Near complete responses to concurrent brentuximab vedotin and ultra-hypofractionated low-dose total skin electron beam radiation in advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
    Oymanns, Mathias
    Daum-Marzian, Michael
    Bellm, Aliyah
    Elsayad, Khaled
    Eich, Hans T.
    Assaf, Chalid
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 188 (01) : 145 - 146
  • [7] Low-dose electron beam radiation and romidepsin therapy for symptomatic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma lesions
    Akilov, O. E.
    Grant, C.
    Frye, R.
    Bates, S.
    Piekarz, R.
    Geskin, L. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 167 (01) : 194 - 197
  • [8] Total Skin Electron Beam for Primary Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
    Elsayad, Khaled
    Kriz, Jan
    Moustakis, Christos
    Scobioala, Sergiu
    Reinartz, Gabriele
    Haverkamp, Uwe
    Willich, Normann
    Weishaupt, Carsten
    Stadler, Rudolf
    Sunderkoetter, Cord
    Eich, Hans Theodor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (05): : 1077 - 1086
  • [9] Low-Dose (10-Gy) Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: An Open Clinical Study and Pooled Data Analysis
    Kamstrup, Maria R.
    Gniadecki, Robert
    Iversen, Lars
    Skov, Lone
    Petersen, Peter Meidahl
    Loft, Annika
    Specht, Lena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 92 (01): : 138 - 143
  • [10] Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy as a debulking agent for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: an open-label prospective phase II study
    Kamstrup, M. R.
    Lindahl, L. M.
    Gniadecki, R.
    Iversen, L.
    Skov, L.
    Petersen, P. M.
    Loft, A.
    Specht, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 166 (02) : 399 - 404