Uncertainty Management in the Unit Commitment Problem

被引:284
作者
Ruiz, Pablo A. [1 ]
Philbrick, C. Russ [2 ]
Zak, Eugene [2 ]
Cheung, Kwok W. [2 ]
Sauer, Peter W. [3 ]
机构
[1] CRA Int, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] AREVA T&D, Redmond, WA 98052 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Economic dispatch; operating reserve; optimization; Monte Carlo simulation; reliability; stochastic programming; unit commitment; STOCHASTIC SECURITY; MODEL; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2008.2012180
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Uncertainty in power systems operations has been traditionally managed by multistage decision making and operating reserve requirements. A familiar example of multistage decisions is day-ahead unit commitment and real-time economic dispatch. An alternate approach for managing uncertainty is a stochastic formulation, which allows the explicit modeling of the sources of uncertainty. This paper compares stochastic and reserve methods and evaluates the benefits of a combined approach for the efficient management of uncertainty in the unit commitment problem. Numerical studies show that unit commitment solutions obtained for the combined approach are robust and superior with respect to the traditional approach in terms of both economics and reliability metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 651
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ANSTINE LT, 1963, IEEE T PAS, V82, P726, DOI DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1963.291390
[2]  
Barth R, 2006, 2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROBABILISTIC METHODS APPLIED TO POWER SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, P26
[3]  
Billinton R., 1996, Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-7731-7
[4]   Market-clearing with stochastic security - Part II: Case studies [J].
Bouffard, F ;
Galiana, FD ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (04) :1827-1835
[5]   Market-clearing with stochastic security - Part I: Formulation [J].
Bouffard, F ;
Galiana, FD ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (04) :1818-1826
[6]   Stochastic optimization of unit commitment: A new decomposition framework [J].
Carpentier, P ;
Cohen, G ;
Culioli, JC ;
Renaud, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1996, 11 (02) :1067-1073
[7]   Scenario reduction in stochastic programming -: An approach using probability metrics [J].
Dupacová, J ;
Gröwe-Kuska, N ;
Römisch, W .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2003, 95 (03) :493-511
[8]   Scheduling and pricing of coupled energy and primary, secondary, and tertiary reserves [J].
Galiana, FD ;
Bouffard, F ;
Arroyo, JM ;
Restrepo, JF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2005, 93 (11) :1970-1983
[9]   Unit commitment in power generation -: a basic model and some extensions [J].
Gollmer, R ;
Nowak, MP ;
Römisch, W ;
Schultz, R .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 96 (1-4) :167-189
[10]   The IEEE reliability test system - 1996 [J].
Grigg, C ;
Wong, P ;
Albrecht, P ;
Allan, R ;
Bhavaraju, M ;
Billinton, R ;
Chen, Q ;
Fong, C ;
Haddad, S ;
Kuruganty, S ;
Li, W ;
Mukerji, R ;
Patton, D ;
Rau, N ;
Reppen, D ;
Schneider, A ;
Shahidehpour, M ;
Singh, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1999, 14 (03) :1010-1018