Statins and chronic heart failure: Do we need a large-scale outcome trial?

被引:106
|
作者
Krum, H
McMurray, JJ
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3181, Australia
[2] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01827-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are of proven clinical benefit in coronary heart disease, at least in those patients who do not have overt chronic heart failure (CHF). However, as there have been no prospective clinical trials of statins in CHF patients, the question arises as to whether the benefits observed in the absence of CHF can be necessarily inferred in those patients in whom CHF is established. In this review, the evidence base stating support of the use of statins in CHF is presented, as well as theoretical considerations as to why these agents may not necessarily be of benefit in this setting. The beneficial potential of statins clearly relates to their plaque stabilization proper-ties and associated improvements in endothelial function, which together should reduce the risk of further infarction and, perhaps, the ischemic burden on the failing ventricle. Furthermore, these agents may have beneficial effects independent of lipid lowering. These include actions on neoangiogenesis, downregulation of AT(1) receptors, inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine activity and favorable modulation of the autonomic nervous system. The potential adverse effects of statins in CHF include reduction in levels of coenzyme Q10 (which may further exacerbate oxidative stress in CHF) and loss of the protection that lipoproteins may provide through binding and detoxifying endotoxins entering the circulation via the gut. In support of these possibilities are epidemiologic data linking a lower serum cholesterol with a poorer prognosis in CHF. These uncertainties indicate the need for a definitive outcome trial to assess the efficacy and safety of statins in CHF, despite their current widespread, nonevidence based use in this population. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1567-73) (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1567 / 1573
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Statins in heart failure: do we need another trial?
    Bonsu, Kwadwo Osei
    Kadirvelu, Amudha
    Reidpath, Daniel Diamond
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2013, 9 : 303 - 319
  • [2] Heart failure and statins -: Why do we need a clinical trial?
    Böhm, M
    Hjalmarson, A
    Kjekshus, J
    Laufs, U
    McMurray, J
    van Veldhuisen, DJ
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2005, 94 (04): : 223 - 230
  • [3] Large-scale heart failure trial underway
    不详
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (09) : 36N - 37N
  • [4] Large-scale comparative neuroimaging: Where are we and what do we need?
    de Schotten, Michel Thiebaut
    Croxson, Paula L.
    Mars, Rogier B.
    CORTEX, 2019, 118 : 188 - 202
  • [5] Do we need new quality markers for chronic heart failure?
    Klabnik, A.
    Murin, J.
    Kycina, P.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2010, 111 (07): : 392 - 397
  • [6] Statins in Heart Failure—Where Do We Stand?
    Kristopher S. Lyons
    Gary E. McVeigh
    Mark T. Harbinson
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2011, 25 : 99 - 104
  • [7] Vitamin D and the heart: Why we need large-scale clinical trials
    Manson, Joann E.
    CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 77 (12) : 903 - 910
  • [8] Statins in Heart Failure-Where Do We Stand?
    Lyons, Kristopher S.
    McVeigh, Gary E.
    Harbinson, Mark T.
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2011, 25 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [9] Is it time for clinical use of LMWH in women with adverse pregnancy outcome or do we need large-scale prospective studies?
    Cetin, I
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2005, 3 (04) : 791 - 792
  • [10] MATCHING OPTIMAL PACEMAKER TO PATIENT - DO WE NEED A LARGE-SCALE CLINICAL-TRIAL OF PACEMAKER MODE SELECTION
    OVSYSHCHER, IE
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 18 (10): : 1845 - 1852