Evaluation of Ki-67 index in EUS-FNA specimens for the assessment of malignancy risk in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

被引:144
|
作者
Hasegawa, Toshiyuki [1 ]
Yamao, Kenji [1 ]
Hijioka, Susumu [1 ]
Bhatia, Vikram [2 ]
Mizuno, Nobumasa [1 ]
Hara, Kazuo [1 ]
Imaoka, Hiroshi [1 ]
Niwa, Yasumasa [3 ]
Tajika, Masahiro [3 ]
Kondo, Shinya [3 ]
Tanaka, Tutomu [3 ]
Shimizu, Yasuhiro [4 ]
Kinoshita, Taira [4 ]
Kohsaki, Takuhiro [5 ]
Nishimori, Isao [5 ]
Iwasaki, Shinji [5 ]
Saibara, Toshiji [5 ]
Hosoda, Waki [6 ]
Yatabe, Yasushi [6 ]
机构
[1] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Nagoya, Aichi 4648681, Japan
[2] Inst Liver & Biliary Sci, Dept Med Hepatol, Delhi, India
[3] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Endoscopy, Nagoya, Aichi 4648681, Japan
[4] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Nagoya, Aichi 4648681, Japan
[5] Kochi Med Sch, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Kochi, Japan
[6] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Pathol & Mol Diagnost, Nagoya, Aichi 4648681, Japan
关键词
FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; ENDOCRINE TUMORS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; GRADING SYSTEM; MASS LESIONS; GUIDED FNA; CARCINOMAS; BEHAVIOR; HETEROGENEITY; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1344958
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aim: Malignancy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is graded by assessing the resected specimens according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 criteria. The feasibility of such grading using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens remains unclear. The aim of this study was to ascertain the optimal method of measuring the Ki-67 index in EUS-FNA specimens, using resected specimens as the criterion standard. Patients and methods: A total of 58 consecutive patients diagnosed with PNETs between March 1998 and May 2011 were included. The study measured intratumoral Ki-67 index heterogeneity, concordance rates of PNET grading by EUS-FNA with grade of the resected tumor, optimal method of measuring the Ki-67 index in EUS-FNA specimens, and survival analysis based on EUS-FNA specimen grading. Results: Intratumoral dispersion of Ki-67 index in resected specimens was 0.033 for Grade 1 and 0.782 for Grade 2 tumors (P<0.001). Concordance rates for WHO classification between EUS-FNA and resected specimens were 74.0% using the mean Ki-67 index in EUS-FNA specimens and 77.8% using the highest Ki-67 index. The concordance rate rose to 90% when EUS-FNA samples with less than 2000 tumor cells were excluded (26% of EUS-FNA cases). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly stratified by the EUS-FNA grading of PNETs with 5-year survival rates of 100%, 58.3%, and 0%, for Grade 1, Grade 2, and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) tumors, respectively. Conclusions: Grading of PNETs by the highest Ki-67 index in EUS-FNA specimens with adequate cellularity has a high concordance with grading of resected specimens, and can predict long term patient survival with high accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 38
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ki-67 assessment in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: is EUS-FNA still a valid ally?
    Valdivia, Pablo Cortegoso
    Rizza, Stefano
    De Angelis, Claudio Giovanni
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2021, 21 (02) : 496 - 497
  • [2] ROLE OF EUS-FNA IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS AND VALUE OF KI-67 EXPRESSION MEASUREMENT ON CYTOLOGICAL SPECIMENS
    De Angelis, C.
    Pacchioni, D.
    Carucci, P.
    Bruno, M.
    Allegranza, P.
    Barreca, A.
    Brizzi, F.
    Valente, V.
    Mezzabotta, L.
    Reggio, D.
    Rizzetto, M.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2011, 43 : S143 - S143
  • [3] EUS-FNA VERSUS EUS-FNB PROVIDES FOR ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS AND GRADING PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS BASED ON THE KI-67 PROLOFERATIVE INDEX
    Badillo, Ricardo
    Ramireddy, Srinivas
    Patil, Prithvi
    Davee, Tomas
    Zhang, Songling
    Thosani, Nirav
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB585 - AB585
  • [4] EUS-FNA in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Accuracy of Ki-67 Measurement on Cytological Samples: The Turin Experience
    Rizza, S.
    Valdivia, Cortegoso P.
    Venezia, L.
    Bruno, M.
    Gaia, S.
    De Angelis, C.
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 106 : 146 - 146
  • [5] Accuracy of Ki-67 Index Obtained From FNA Specimens in the Diagnosis and Grading of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Livingston, Austin
    Strong, Erin
    Christians, Kathleen
    Tsai, Susan
    Khan, Abdul
    Dua, Kulwinder
    Hunt, Bryan
    Hagen, Catherine
    Evans, Douglas
    Clarke, Callisia
    PANCREAS, 2020, 49 (03) : 476 - 476
  • [6] CORRELATION BETWEEN EUS-FNA AND SURGICAL SPECIMEN FOR KI67 INDEX AND TUMOR GRADING IN PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS
    Baruah, Anushka
    Adsay, Volkan
    Pant, Mamta
    Khan, Abdul H.
    Yarur, Andres J.
    Dua, Kulwinder S.
    Aburajab, Murad
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB442 - AB443
  • [7] Staining for p53 and Ki-67 increases the sensitivity of EUS-FNA to detect pancreatic malignancy
    Jahng, Alexander W.
    Reicher, Sonya
    Chung, David
    Varela, Donna
    Chhablani, Rahul
    Dev, Anil
    Binh Pham
    Nieto, Jose
    Venegas, Rose J.
    French, Samuel W.
    Stabile, Bruce E.
    Eysselein, Viktor E.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 2 (11): : 362 - 368
  • [8] Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs): Role of Endoscopic Ultra Sound-Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) and Accuracy of Ki-67 Measurement on Cytological Specimens
    De Angelis, C. G.
    Pacchioni, D.
    Barreca, A.
    Carucci, P.
    Bruno, M.
    Mezzabotta, L.
    Marietti, M.
    Manfre, S. F.
    Fasulo, R.
    Sapino, A.
    Rizzetto, M.
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 99 (3-4) : 245 - 245
  • [9] THE ROLE OF EUS-FNA IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS
    Carrara, S.
    Rahal, D.
    Zerbi, A.
    Anderloni, A.
    Di Leo, M.
    Di Tommaso, L.
    Loriga, A.
    Federico, D.
    Repici, A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2016, 48 : E184 - E184
  • [10] Reliability of Ki-67 Determination in FNA Samples for Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Diaz del Arco, Cristina
    Diaz Perez, J. Angel
    Ortega Medina, Luis
    Sastre Valera, Javier
    Fernandez Acenero, M. Jesus
    ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY, 2016, 27 (04) : 276 - 283