Metacognitive monitoring of attention performance and its influencing factors

被引:8
|
作者
Kessel, Ramona [1 ]
Gecht, Judith [1 ]
Forkmann, Thomas [1 ]
Drueke, Barbara [1 ]
Gauggel, Siegfried [1 ]
Mainz, Verena [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Med Psychol & Med Sociol, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
来源
关键词
CONFIDENCE; KNOWLEDGE; CONGRUENCE; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00426-013-0511-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Metacognitive monitoring is a central element of metacognitive processing exerting widespread influences on information processing. Albeit being subject to numerous empirical investigations referring to memory performance, there is little research investigating metacognitive monitoring in other cognitive domains. The present study investigated in 45 healthy students whether factors that are known to influence monitoring of memory performance, i.e. task difficulty, time of assessment, and practice, also exhibit a significant impact on monitoring of attention performance. A multivariate analysis of variance with three within-subject repeated measures factors on two dependent variables (monitoring of (a) time, and (b) errors in an attention task) was conducted. Results showed that monitoring ability significantly decreased with increasing task difficulty, was significantly better for post than for pre-assessment, and significantly increased with practice. Therefore, results suggest that the examined factors influenced monitoring of attention performance equivalent to the influence of these factors found in metamemory research.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 607
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Metacognitive monitoring of attention performance and its influencing factors
    Ramona Kessel
    Judith Gecht
    Thomas Forkmann
    Barbara Drueke
    Siegfried Gauggel
    Verena Mainz
    Psychological Research, 2014, 78 : 597 - 607
  • [2] Product, not process: Metacognitive monitoring of visual performance during sustained attention
    Kim, Cheongil
    Chong, Sang Chul
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2025,
  • [3] FACTORS INFLUENCING CAPILLARY MONITORING PERFORMANCE
    GLAZKOV, YA
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING, 1993, 29 (05) : 386 - 390
  • [4] Public network attention to hiking in China and its influencing factors
    Zhang, Qing
    Sun, Huazhen
    Lin, Qiuyan
    Lin, Kaimiao
    Chong, Kim Mee
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):
  • [5] Metacognitive Knowledge and Mathematical Intelligence-Two Significant Factors Influencing School Performance
    Chytry, Vlastimil
    Rican, Jaroslav
    Eisenmann, Petr
    Medova, Janka
    MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (06)
  • [6] Metacognitive factors and alterations of attention related to predisposition to hallucinations
    Cangas, AJ
    Errasti, JM
    García-Montes, JM
    Alvarez, R
    Ruiz, R
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 40 (03) : 487 - 496
  • [7] Dividing attention impairs metacognitive control more than monitoring
    Yaoping Peng
    Jonathan G. Tullis
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2021, 28 : 2064 - 2074
  • [8] Electrodeionization: Principle, techniques and factors influencing its performance
    Kumar, P. Senthil
    Varsha, M.
    Rathi, B. Senthil
    Rangasamy, Gayathri
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 216
  • [9] Dividing attention impairs metacognitive control more than monitoring
    Peng, Yaoping
    Tullis, Jonathan G.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2021, 28 (06) : 2064 - 2074
  • [10] Metacognitive monitoring training and academic performance in college
    Wagener, B.
    PSYCHOLOGIE FRANCAISE, 2018, 63 (04): : 401 - 412