Risk Factors for Reoperation Following Final Fusion After the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis with Traditional Growing Rods

被引:9
|
作者
Du, Jerry Y. [1 ,2 ]
Poe-Kochert, Connie [1 ,2 ]
Thompson, George H. [1 ,2 ]
Hardesty, Christina K. [1 ,2 ]
Pawelek, Jeff B. [1 ,3 ]
Flynn, John M. [1 ,4 ]
Emans, John B. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Rainbow Babies & Childrens Hosp, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Rainbow Babies & Childrens Hosp, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Div Pediat Orthopaed,Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Growing Spine Fdn, Milwaukee, WI USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Orthoped, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA
来源
关键词
SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.20.00312
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although there is a high rate of reoperation after final fusion following the treatment of early-onset scoliosis with use of traditional growing rods, the risk factors for reoperation are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to identify risk factors associated with the need for reoperation after final fusion for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Methods: A multicenter database for patients with early-onset scoliosis was retrospectively analyzed. Patients managed with traditional growing rods and final fusion were identified (n = 248). The inclusion criteria were >= 1 lengthening procedure with traditional growing rods and >= 2 years of follow-up after final fusion or revision surgery within 2 years after final fusion (167 patients; 67%). Patients requiring reoperation following final fusion were compared with patients who did not require reoperation. The data that were analyzed included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, spinal deformity characteristics, radiographic measurements, perioperative details, and complications during all stages of treatment. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent risk factors. Results: The mean duration of follow-up from the initial visit to the latest visit was 10.7 +/- 4.1 years, and the mean duration of follow-up after final fusion was 4.9 +/- 3.1 years. Thirty-two (19%) of the 167 patients required reoperation following final fusion. Curve progression requiring revision surgery during lengthening with traditional growing rods (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 21.137 per event; p = 0.028), the number of levels spanned with traditional growing rods (aOR, 1.378 per level; p = 0.007), and the duration of treatment with traditional growing rods (aOR, 1.220 per year; p = 0.035) were independently associated with revision surgery after final fusion. Conclusions: Independent risk factors for curve progression requiring reoperation during lengthening with traditional growing rods that require operative intervention include increasing number of levels spanned with traditional growing rods and longer duration of treatment with traditional growing rods. These findings may help with patient counseling and potentially guide surgeon decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1672 / 1678
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of traditional growing rods in the era of magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis
    Varley, Eric S.
    Pawelek, Jeff B.
    Mundis, Greg M., Jr.
    Oetgen, Matthew E.
    Sturm, Peter F.
    Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
    Yaszay, Burt
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2021, 9 (05) : 1465 - 1472
  • [2] The role of traditional growing rods in the era of magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis
    Eric S. Varley
    Jeff B. Pawelek
    Greg M. Mundis Jr.
    Matthew E. Oetgen
    Peter F. Sturm
    Behrooz A. Akbarnia
    Burt Yaszay
    Spine Deformity, 2021, 9 : 1465 - 1472
  • [3] Growing rods in early-onset scoliosis
    Berger-Groch, Josephine
    Stuecker, Ralf
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 16 (09): : E601 - E602
  • [4] Avoidance of "Final" Surgical Fusion After Growing-Rod Treatment for Early-Onset Scoliosis
    Jain, Amit
    Sponseller, Paul D.
    Flynn, John M.
    Shah, Suken A.
    Thompson, George H.
    Emans, John B.
    Pawelek, Jeff B.
    Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (13): : 1073 - 1078
  • [5] Final Fusion After Growing-Rod Treatment for Early Onset Scoliosis Is It Really Final?
    Poe-Kochert, Connie
    Shannon, Claire
    Pawelek, Jeff B.
    Thompson, George H.
    Hardesty, Christina K.
    Marks, David S.
    Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
    McCarthy, Richard E.
    Emans, John B.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (22): : 1913 - 1917
  • [6] Magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis
    Meyer, Charlotte Sommer
    Rickers, Kresten
    Eiskjaer, Soren Peter
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 69 (04):
  • [7] Traditional Dual Growing Rods With 2 Different Apical Control Techniques in the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis
    Wang, Shengru
    Zhao, Yiwei
    Lin, Guanfeng
    Du, You
    Yang, Yang
    Zhang, Jianguo
    NEUROSPINE, 2023, 20 (03) : 1061 - 1072
  • [8] Comparison of Early Definitive Fusion and Traditional Growing Rods in Early-onset Dystrophic Scoliosis in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Preliminary Report
    Tauchi, Ryoji
    Kawakami, Noriaki
    Suzuki, Teppei
    Uno, Koki
    Yamaguchi, Toru
    Yanagida, Haruhisa
    Yamamoto, Takuya
    Murakami, Hideki
    Demura, Satoru
    Kotani, Toshiaki
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 40 (10) : 569 - 574
  • [9] Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with growing rods in patients with neurofibromatosis-1
    Carbone, Marco
    Vittoria, Francesca
    Del Sal, Alice
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2019, 28 (03): : 278 - 287
  • [10] Rib-Based Anchors for Growing Rods in the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis
    Miller, Daniel J.
    Vitale, Michael G.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 26 (04) : 241 - 246