Evaluation of accuracy and time taken to make an open tray implant impressions with two techniques

被引:2
|
作者
Reddy, M. Sai Teja [1 ]
Ahmed, Nabeel [1 ]
Maiti, Subhabrata [1 ]
Ganapathy, Dhanraj M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Dept Prosthodont & Implantol, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Accuracy; discrepancy; implants; innovation; open tray impression; time; MICROBIAL FINDINGS; BOND STRENGTH; PERI-IMPLANT; DISPLACEMENT; CELLS; PINK;
D O I
10.4103/japtr.japtr_308_22
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Implant dentistry's emergence and acceptance have provided physicians with a wide range of new options for fixed and removable rehabilitation. The eventual replacement of the lost tooth is the ultimate success, and this can be accomplished using recognized prosthodontic methods. The present study aims to evaluate the time and dimensional accuracy of implant definitive models with an open tray impression with two different techniques. Impression was made in two different techniques and the cast was poured and checked for the time taken and the accuracy of the impression. In IBM SPSS software version 23.0 all the results were statistically analyzed. An Independent t-test was performed for the parameters. No statistically significant difference was present (P > 0.05) when comparing the accuracy and time taken between the two groups. It is concluded that time taken and the misfit is less for modified open tray impression techniques when compared to the regular open tray impression.
引用
收藏
页码:S437 / S441
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of accuracy and time taken to make an open tray implant impressions with two techniques
    Reddy, M. Sai Teja
    Ahmed, Nabeel
    Maiti, Subhabrata
    Ganapathy, Dhanraj M.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (06) : 437 - 441
  • [2] Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays
    Burns, J
    Palmer, R
    Howe, L
    Wilson, R
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (03): : 250 - 255
  • [3] A technique for facilitating open-tray implant impressions
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Yilmaz, Burak
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 122 (04): : 417 - 419
  • [4] Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions
    Vigolo, P
    Majzoub, Z
    Cordioli, G
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (02): : 186 - 192
  • [5] Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept
    Liu, David Yu
    Cader, Fathima Nashmie
    Abduo, Jaafar
    Palamara, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (02): : E682 - E687
  • [6] Use of aluminum foil to facilitate open-tray implant impressions
    Su, Fang -Yu
    Segal, Aaron
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 129 (01): : 239 - 240
  • [7] Clinical Accuracy Outcomes of Closed-Tray and Open-Tray Implant Impression Techniques for Partially Edentulous Patients
    Gallucci, German O.
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    Ashy, Linah M.
    Kim, Go Eun
    Brady, Nicholas J.
    Weber, Hans-Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2011, 24 (05) : 469 - 472
  • [8] On Comparing Two Different Tray-Holding Techniques for Edentulous Maxillary Impressions
    Rignon-Bret, Christophe
    Mushegyan, Vagan
    Naveau, Adrien
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2016, 29 (02) : 169 - 172
  • [9] Accuracy of tooth-implant impressions: Comparison of five different techniques
    Fathi, Amirhossein
    Rismanchian, Mansour
    Yazdekhasti, Atousa
    Salamati, Masih
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 9 (03): : 526 - 534
  • [10] Comparison of the Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Two Different digital Impressions of Single Tooth Implant Treatments
    Alibrahim, Muhammed
    Aslan, Yilmaz Umut
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (01): : 72 - 80