Development and Testing of Compatible Diagnosis Code Lists for the Functional Comorbidity Index: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification

被引:9
|
作者
Sears, Jeanne M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Rundell, Sean D. [1 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Box 357660, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Harborview Injury Prevent & Res Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Comparat Effect Cost & Outcomes Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Functional Comorbidity Index; comorbidity; risk adjustment; International Classification of Diseases; health status; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; OUTCOMES; ASSOCIATION; ADJUSTMENT; SEVERITY; ICD-9-CM; ILLNESS; STROKE; LENGTH; STAY;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0000000000001420
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) was developed for community-based adult populations, with function as the outcome. The original FCI was a survey tool, but several International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code lists-for calculating the FCI using administrative data-have been published. However, compatible International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and ICD-10-CM versions have not been available. Objective: We developed ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis code lists to optimize FCI concordance across ICD lexicons. Research Design: We assessed concordance and frequency distributions across ICD lexicons for the FCI and individual comorbidities. We used length of stay and discharge disposition to assess continuity of FCI criterion validity across lexicons. Subjects: State Inpatient Databases from Arizona, Colorado, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Utah, and Washington State (calendar year 2015) were obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. State Inpatient Databases contained ICD-9-CM diagnoses for the first 3 calendar quarters of 2015 and ICD-10-CM diagnoses for the fourth quarter of 2015. Inpatients under 18 years old were excluded. Measures: Length of stay and discharge disposition outcomes were assessed in separate regression models. Covariates included age, sex, state, ICD lexicon, and FCI/lexicon interaction. Results: The FCI demonstrated stability across lexicons, despite small discrepancies in prevalence for individual comorbidities. Under ICD-9-CM, each additional comorbidity was associated with an 8.9% increase in mean length of stay and an 18.5% decrease in the odds of a routine discharge, compared with an 8.4% increase and 17.4% decrease, respectively, under ICD-10-CM. Conclusion: This study provides compatible ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis code lists for the FCI.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1050
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The complexity and challenges of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification transition in EDs
    Krive, Jacob
    Patel, Mahatkumar
    Gehm, Lisa
    Mackey, Mark
    Kulstad, Erik
    Li, Jianrong John
    Lussier, Yves A.
    Boyd, Andrew D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 33 (05): : 713 - 718
  • [2] Comorbidity adjustment index for the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision
    Ramiarina, Robert Antonio
    Ramiarina, Beatriz Luiza
    Almeida, Renan Moritz V. R.
    de Albuquerque Pereira, Wagner Coelho
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2008, 42 (04): : 590 - 597
  • [3] Positive Predictive Value of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification, Codes for Identification of Congenital Heart Defects
    Ivey, Lindsey C.
    Rodriguez III, Fred H.
    Shi, Haoming
    Chong, Cohen
    Chen, Joy
    Raskind-Hood, Cheryl L.
    Downing, Karrie F.
    Farr, Sherry L.
    Book, Wendy M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (16):
  • [4] Smoothing the transition from International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification to International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision
    Tanno, Luciana Kase
    Calderon, Moises
    Sublett, James L.
    Casale, Thomas
    Demoly, Pascal
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2016, 4 (06): : 1265 - 1267
  • [5] Classification System for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and Tenth Revision Pediatric Mental Health Disorders
    Zima, Bonnie T.
    Gay, James C.
    Rodean, Jonathan
    Doupnik, Stephanie K.
    Rockhill, Carol
    Davidson, Amber
    Hall, Matt
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2020, 174 (06) : 620 - 622
  • [6] Preparing for International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification Implementation Strategies for Maintaining an Efficient Workflow
    Dexheimer, Judith W.
    Scheid, Beth
    Babaoff, Arash
    Martens, Saundra
    Kennebeck, Stephanie
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2015, 31 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [7] Translation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index From the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification to the Tenth Revision
    Duchesneau, Emilie D.
    Shmuel, Shahar
    Faurot, Keturah R.
    Park, Jihye
    Musty, Allison
    Pate, Virginia
    Kinlaw, Alan C.
    Sturmer, Til
    Yang, Yang Claire
    Funk, Michele Jonsson
    Lund, Jennifer L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 192 (12) : 2085 - 2093
  • [9] ON THE 10TH REVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES (ICD)
    OLBRICH, R
    MAURER, K
    NERVENHEILKUNDE, 1988, 7 (03) : 139 - 141
  • [10] Utility of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification Codes for Communicable Disease Surveillance
    Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E.
    Weber, David J.
    Poole, Charles
    MacDonald, Pia D. M.
    Maillard, Jean-Marie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 172 (11) : 1299 - 1305