Invariance Testing of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale

被引:3
|
作者
Baker, Russell T. [1 ,2 ]
Casanova, Madeline P. [1 ]
Pickering, Michael A. [1 ]
Baker, Jayme G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Movement Sci, 875 Perimeter Dr, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, WWAMI Med Educ Program, Moscow, ID USA
关键词
instrument development; confirmatory factor analysis; multigroup invariance testing; covariance modeling; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL SCALE; DECISION-MAKING; FIT INDEXES; PART II;
D O I
10.4085/1062-6050-0302.19
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: The increased emphasis on implementing evidence-based practice has reinforced the need to more accurately assess patient improvement. Psychometrically sound, patient-reported outcome measures are essential for evaluating patient care. A patient-reported outcome instrument that may be useful for clinicians is the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale (DPAS). Before adopting this scale, however, researchers must evaluate its psychometric properties, particularly across subpopulations. Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the DPAS in a large sample using confirmatory factor analysis procedures and assess structural invariance of the scale across sex, age, injury status, and athletic status groups. Design: Observational study. Setting: Twenty-two clinical sites. Patients or Other Participants: Of 1445 physically active individuals recruited from multiple athletic training clinical sites, data from 1276 were included in the analysis. Respondents were either healthy or experiencing an acute, subacute, or persistent musculoskeletal injury. Main Outcome Measure(s): A confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the full sample, and multigroup invariance testing was conducted to assess differences across sex, age, injury status, and athletic status. Given the poor model fit, alternate model generation was used to identify a more parsimonious factor structure. Results: The DPAS did not meet contemporary fit index recommendations or the criteria to demonstrate structural invariance. We identified an 8-item model that met the model fit recommendations using alternate model generation. Conclusions: The 16-item DPAS did not meet the model fit recommendations and may not be the most parsimonious or reliable measure for assessing disablement and quality of life. Use of the 16-item DPAS across subpopulations of interest is not recommended. More examination involving a true cross-validation sample should be completed on the 8-item DPAS before this scale is adopted in research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1189
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Invariance Testing of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-10
    Casanova, Madeline P.
    Baker, Russell T.
    Pickering, Michael A.
    Baker, Jayme G.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2021, 56 (09) : 1037 - 1041
  • [2] The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale
    Acar, Manolya
    Ozturk, Demet
    Demirsoz, Mert
    Tekindal, Mustafa Agah
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2023, 32 (06) : 665 - 673
  • [3] The development of summary components for the Disablement in the Physically Active scale in collegiate athletes
    Houston, Megan N.
    Hoch, Johanna M.
    Van Lunen, Bonnie L.
    Hoch, Matthew C.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (11) : 2657 - 2662
  • [4] Readability of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale in Pediatric Athletes: A Preliminary Investigation
    Marshall, Ashley N.
    Lam, Kenneth C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC THERAPY & TRAINING, 2022, 27 (04): : 199 - 202
  • [5] The development of summary components for the Disablement in the Physically Active scale in collegiate athletes
    Megan N. Houston
    Johanna M. Hoch
    Bonnie L. Van Lunen
    Matthew C. Hoch
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 2657 - 2662
  • [6] Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8: psychometric evaluation
    Casanova, Madeline P.
    Nelson, Megan C.
    Pickering, Michael A.
    Larkins, Lindsay W.
    Appleby, Karen M.
    Grindley, Emma J.
    Baker, Russell T.
    BMC SPORTS SCIENCE MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [7] Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8: psychometric evaluation
    Madeline P. Casanova
    Megan C. Nelson
    Michael A. Pickering
    Lindsay W. Larkins
    Karen M. Appleby
    Emma J. Grindley
    Russell T. Baker
    BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 13
  • [8] The Disablement in the Physically Active Scale, Part II: The Psychometric Properties of an Outcomes Scale for Musculoskeletal Injuries
    Vela, Luzita I.
    Denegar, Craig R.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2010, 45 (06) : 630 - 641
  • [9] Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Validation: Disablement in the Physically Active Scale
    Stankevitz, Diane
    Larkins, Lindsay
    Baker, Russell T.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2019, 54 (03) : 319 - 323
  • [10] Differences in the Modified Disablement in the Physically Active Scale in Those With and Without Chronic Ankle Instability
    Hoch, Johanna M.
    Baez, Shelby E.
    Cramer, Robert J.
    Hoch, Matthew C.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2019, 28 (05) : 476 - 480