Individual timing of blood counts in G-CSF prophylaxis after myelosuppressive chemotherapy reduces G-CSF injections, blood counts, and costs:: a prospective randomized study in children and adolescents

被引:2
|
作者
Ammann, RA [1 ]
Leibundgut, K [1 ]
Hirt, A [1 ]
Lüthy, AR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Hematol & Oncol, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
G-CSF; supportive care; myelosuppression; pediatric malignancies; leukemia;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-002-0365-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In children and adolescents, prophylactic application of G-CSF after myelosuppressive chemotherapy reduces the duration of neutropenia, of hospitalization, and of parenteral antibiotic treatment. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and solid tumors, G-CSF support allows dose intensification of chemotherapy. On the other hand, each G-CSF injection causes pain and costs. We set up the hypothesis that besides strategies as restricted indications, delayed start, lower doses, and stringent rules for discontinuation, individualized timing of blood count might optimize G-CSF prophylaxis. We randomized 64 cycles of G-CSF prophylaxis in eight children and adolescents being treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia or solid tumors to standard twice a week or to individually timed blood counts. Primary study endpoints were the numbers of G-CSF doses and of blood counts, and the total costs of G-CSF support. Per cycle, individual timing of blood count resulted in a median of one G-CSF injection fewer [estimated population median (EPM) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-2.20] and one blood count fewer (EPM 1.00, 95% CI 0.74-1.33). The total costs of G-CSF support and of blood counts were thereby reduced by a median of US $ 152 per cycle (EPM 191, 95% CI 97-318). The results of this study suggest that individual timing of blood counts during prophylactic G-CSF support in children and adolescents undergoing chemotherapy for malignant disease can significantly reduce the number of injections and blood counts performed, thus resulting in less pain and lower costs. These findings need confirmation in a larger randomized trial.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 618
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual timing of blood counts in G-CSF prophylaxis after myelosuppressive chemotherapy reduces G-CSF injections, blood counts, and costs: a prospective randomized study in children and adolescents
    Roland A. Ammann
    Kurt Leibundgut
    Andreas Hirt
    Annette Ridolfi Lüthy
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2002, 10 : 613 - 618
  • [2] Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children using G-CSF after carboplatin containing myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Rauck, AM
    Ruymann, FB
    Klopfenstein, K
    Grossman, N
    Rosselet, R
    Grovas, L
    Ceselski, S
    Hayes, J
    Grovas, AC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 1998, 13 (04) : 146 - 154
  • [3] G-CSF AND G-CSF BIOSIMILARS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS UNDERGOING MYELOSUPPRESSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY
    Curigliano, Giuseppe
    Botteri, Edoardo
    Krendyukov, Andriy
    BREAST, 2017, 36 : S69 - S69
  • [4] G-CSF alone is superior to chemotherapy plus G-CSF for 2nd mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) after failure of adequate mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF
    Fraipont, V
    Sautois, B
    Baudoux, E
    Pereira, M
    Fassotte, MF
    Longrée, L
    Jerusalem, G
    Hermanne, JP
    Schaaf-Lafontaine, N
    Sondag, D
    Fillet, G
    Beguin, Y
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 23 : S213 - S213
  • [5] G-CSF prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia and infections after chemotherapy
    Link, H.
    ONKOLOGE, 2014, 20 (03): : 268 - 270
  • [6] Failure of adequate mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) with chemotherapy and G-CSF:: G-CSF alone is superior to chemotherapy plus G-CSF for 2nd mobilization.
    Fraipont, V
    Sautois, B
    Baudoux, E
    Pereira, M
    Fassotte, MF
    Jerusalem, G
    Hermanne, JP
    Longrée, L
    Schaaf-Lafontaine, N
    Sondag, D
    Fillet, G
    Beguin, Y
    BLOOD, 1998, 92 (10) : 268A - 268A
  • [7] A randomized study of filgrastim (G-CSF) after autologous peripheral blood transplantation.
    Ojeda, E
    Garcia-Bustos, J
    Aguado, MJ
    Arrieta, R
    Quevedo, E
    Jiménez-Yuste, V
    Martin, MP
    Canales, M
    Hdez-Maraver, MD
    Jiménez, M
    Alvarez, MT
    Morado, M
    Sevilla, J
    Hdez-Navarro, F
    BLOOD, 1998, 92 (10) : 325B - 325B
  • [8] Predictive value of circulating immature cell counts in peripheral blood for timing of peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after G-CSF plus chemotherapy-induced mobilization
    Kozuka, T
    Ikeda, K
    Teshima, T
    Kojima, K
    Matsuo, K
    Bessho, A
    Sunami, K
    Hiramatsu, Y
    Maeda, Y
    Noguchi, T
    Yamamoto, K
    Fujii, N
    Imai, T
    Takenaka, K
    Shinagawa, K
    Ishimaru, F
    Niiya, K
    Koide, N
    Tanimoto, M
    Harada, M
    TRANSFUSION, 2002, 42 (11) : 1514 - 1522
  • [9] Randomized comparison of G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: effects on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy
    G Spitzer
    D Adkins
    M Mathews
    W Velasquez
    C Bowers
    F Dunphy
    N Kronmueller
    R Niemeyer
    W McIntyre
    P Petruska
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1997, 20 : 921 - 930
  • [10] Prospective, randomized study of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization with daniplestim G-CSF versus placebo plus G-CSf in breast cancer patients.
    DiPersio, JF
    Vredenburg, J
    Copelan, EA
    Prosper, F
    Sola, C
    Lill, M
    Bolwell, BJ
    Santos, VR
    Collins, DM
    Baum, CM
    BLOOD, 1998, 92 (10) : 269A - 269A