Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: Minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach

被引:28
|
作者
Jia Jianbo [1 ]
Ji Ying [1 ]
Liu Xinxin [2 ]
Wu Lianghao [1 ]
Yu Baoqing [1 ]
Ao Rongguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Pudong Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Shanghai 201399, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Tenth Peoples Hosp, Shanghai 201399, Peoples R China
关键词
Femoral neck fracture; Arthroplasty; Hip; SuperPath method; Posterior approach; ARTHROPLASTY; REPLACEMENT; DISLOCATION; 2-INCISION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.006
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH (R)) approach was created by combining the percutaneous preparation of the acetabulum using the percutaneously-assisted total hip (PATH), femoral reaming, and broaching of superior capsulotomy (SuperCap) approach. This technique reported a low complication rate, excellent gait kinematics, low transfusion rate, a shorter length of hospital stay, and a high proportion of discharge from the hospital. As minimally invasive SuperPath approach is designed for both trauma and end-stage degenerative joint disease, we investigated if this technique and standard surgical tools can replace artificial femoral head in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture. We also tested if it has advantages over the traditional posterior approach. Methods: A prospective study was performed in 100 cases of eligible femoral neck fractures from May 01, 2015 to October 31, 2016. They were randomly divided into SuperPath and traditional group. The outcomes were evaluated using preoperative index, intraoperative data, and postoperative function data. Results: No significant difference was detected in the operation time between the two groups. Compared with the traditional group, SuperPath group had smaller incision length, less intraoperative bleeding, lower transfusion rate, and a shorter starting time of weight-bearing activity. Harris Hip Score, Barthel Index, and VAS for pain-level scores in the SuperPath group at 1-week follow-up intervals were significantly lower than the conventional group, but not significantly different at 3-month and 2-year follow-up post-operation. Conclusions: SuperPath approach for artificial femoral head replacement can reduce surgical injury due to smaller size of incision and accelerate weight-bearing activities post-operation to treat senile femoral neck fractures compared with traditional posterior approach surgeries. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1452 / 1459
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SuperPATH Minimally Invasive Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Preliminary Clinical Results
    Wang, Xiao-dong
    Lan, Hai
    Hu, Zheng-xia
    Li, Kai-nan
    Wang, Zheng-hao
    Luo, Jin
    Long, Xu-dong
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (01) : 74 - 85
  • [2] Hip hemiarthroplasty for femur neck fractures: minimally invasive direct anterior approach versus postero-lateral approach
    Pala E.
    Trono M.
    Bitonti A.
    Lucidi G.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2016, 26 (4) : 423 - 427
  • [3] Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with minimally invasive anterior approach in elderly
    Bucs, Gabor
    Dande, Arpad
    Patczai, Balazs
    Sebestyen, Andor
    Almasi, Robert
    Not, Laszlo G.
    Wiegand, Norbert
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 : S37 - S43
  • [4] Direct anterior compared to posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fractures
    Wu, Kevin A.
    Krez, Alexandra N.
    Anastasio, Albert T.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 15 (06):
  • [5] Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures With Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using a Modified Minimally Invasive Posterior Approach in Patients With Neurological Disorders
    Han, Suk-Ku
    Kim, Yong-Sik
    Kang, Soo-Hwan
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (05) : E635 - E640
  • [6] The minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the traditional anterolateral approach (Watson-Jones) for hip hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture: an analysis of clinical outcomes
    Louis de Jong
    Taco M. A. L. Klem
    Tjallingius M. Kuijper
    Gert R. Roukema
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 1943 - 1948
  • [7] The minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the traditional anterolateral approach (Watson-Jones) for hip hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture: an analysis of clinical outcomes
    de Jong, Louis
    Klem, Taco M. A. L.
    Kuijper, Tjallingius M.
    Roukema, Gert R.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (08) : 1943 - 1948
  • [8] Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures
    McCormick, Kyle L.
    Mastroianni, Michael A.
    Herndon, Carl H.
    Sarpong, Nana O.
    Shah, Roshan P.
    Cooper, H. John
    Neuwirth, Alexander L.
    Geller, Jeffrey A.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2024, 30
  • [9] Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach
    Micicoi, Gregoire
    de Geofroy, Bernard
    Chamoux, Julien
    Ghabi, Ammar
    Gauci, Marc-Olivier
    de Dompsure, Regis Bernard
    Bronsard, Nicolas
    Gonzalez, Jean-Francois
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2024, 110 (05)
  • [10] Direct anterior versus posterolateral approach for bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomised study
    Verzellotti, Simone
    Candrian, Christian
    Molina, Mauro
    Filardo, Giuseppe
    Alberio, Riccardo
    Grassi, Federico A.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 30 (06) : 810 - 817