Combined effects of endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density on postmenopausal breast cancer risk: results from the Breakthrough Generations Study

被引:25
|
作者
Schoemaker, M. J. [1 ]
Folkerd, E. J. [2 ,3 ]
Jones, M. E. [1 ]
Rae, M. [2 ,3 ]
Allen, S. [4 ]
Ashworth, A. [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Dowsett, M. [2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
Swerdlow, A. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Div Genet & Epidemiol, London SM2 5NG, England
[2] Inst Canc Res, Div Breast Canc Res, London SW3 6JB, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Acad Dept Biochem, London SW3 6JJ, England
[4] Royal Marsden Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Diagnost Radiol, London SM2 5PT, England
[5] Inst Canc Res, Breakthrough Breast Canc Res Ctr, London SW3 6JB, England
[6] Inst Canc Res, Div Mol Pathol, London SW3 6JB, England
关键词
breast cancer; oestradiol; testosterone; sex hormone-binding globulin; mammographic density; GROWTH-FACTOR; ESTRADIOL LEVELS; SUBSEQUENT RISK; WOMEN; ASSOCIATIONS; STEROIDS; COHORT; SUSCEPTIBILITY; METABOLISM; PROLACTIN;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2014.64
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Mammographic density and sex hormone levels are strong risk factors for breast cancer, but it is unclear whether they represent the same aetiological entity or are independent risk factors. Methods: Within the Breakthrough Generations Study cohort, we conducted a case-control study of 265 postmenopausal breast cancer cases and 343 controls with prediagnostic mammograms and blood samples. Plasma was assayed for oestradiol, testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations and mammographic density assessed by Cumulus. Results: Oestradiol and testosterone were negatively and SHBG positively associated with percentage density and absolute dense area, but after adjusting for body mass index the associations remained significant only for SHBG. Breast cancer risk was independently and significantly positively associated with percentage density (P = 0.002), oestradiol (P 0.002) and testosterone (P = 0.007) levels. Women in the highest tertile of both density and sex hormone level were at greatest risk, with an odds ratio of 7.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.89-21.1) for oestradiol and 4.57 (95% CI: 1.75-11.9) for testosterone and high density compared with those who were in the lowest tertiles. The cumulative risk of breast cancer in the highest oestradiol and density tertiles, representing 8% of controls, was estimated as 12.8% at ages 50-69 years and 19.4% at ages 20-79 years, and in the lowest tertiles was 1.7% and 4.3%, respectively. Associations of breast cancer risk with tertiles of mammographic dense area were less strong than for percentage density. Conclusions: Endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density are independent risk factors for postmenopausal breast cancer, which in combination can identify women who might benefit from increased frequency of screening and chemoprophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:1898 / 1907
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined effects of endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density on postmenopausal breast cancer risk: results from the Breakthrough Generations Study
    M J Schoemaker
    E J Folkerd
    M E Jones
    M Rae
    S Allen
    A Ashworth
    M Dowsett
    A J Swerdlow
    British Journal of Cancer, 2014, 110 : 1898 - 1907
  • [2] Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Byrne, Celia
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Hankinson, Susan E.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (15): : 1178 - 1187
  • [3] Endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density among postmenopausal women
    Tamimi, RM
    Hankinson, SE
    Colditz, GA
    Byrne, C
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (11) : 2641 - 2647
  • [4] Urinary endogenous sex hormone levels and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer
    N C Onland-Moret
    R Kaaks
    P A H van Noord
    S Rinaldi
    T Key
    D E Grobbee
    P H M Peeters
    British Journal of Cancer, 2003, 88 : 1394 - 1399
  • [5] Urinary endogenous sex hormone levels and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer
    Onland-Moret, NC
    Kaaks, R
    van Noord, PAH
    Rinaldi, S
    Key, T
    Grobbee, DE
    Peeters, PHM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 (09) : 1394 - 1399
  • [6] The association of endogenous sex steroids and sex steroid binding proteins with mammographic density: Results from the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions mammographic density study
    Greendale, GA
    Palla, SL
    Ursin, G
    Laughlin, GA
    Crandall, C
    Pike, MC
    Reboussin, BA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 162 (09) : 826 - 834
  • [7] Relationships between circulating hormone levels, mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women
    Harriet Johansson
    Sara Gandini
    Bernardo Bonanni
    Frederique Mariette
    Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga
    Davide Serrano
    Enrico Cassano
    Francesca Ramazzotto
    Laura Baglietto
    Maria Teresa Sandri
    Andrea Decensi
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008, 108 : 57 - 67
  • [8] Relationships between circulating hormone levels, mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women
    Johansson, Harriet
    Gandini, Sara
    Bonanni, Bernardo
    Mariette, Frederique
    Guerrieri-Gonzaga, Aliana
    Serrano, Davide
    Cassano, Enrico
    Ramazzotto, Francesca
    Baglietto, Laura
    Sandri, Maria Teresa
    Decensi, Andrea
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 108 (01) : 57 - 67
  • [9] Mammographic density and postmenopausal breast cancer risk.
    Byrne, C
    Hankinson, SE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 153 (11) : S109 - S109
  • [10] The Heritability of Mammographic Breast Density and Circulating Sex-Hormone Levels: Two Independent Breast Cancer Risk Factors
    Varghese, Jajini S.
    Smith, Paula L.
    Folkerd, Elizabeth
    Brown, Judith
    Leyland, Jean
    Audley, Tina
    Warren, Ruth M. L.
    Dowsett, Mitchell
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Thompson, Deborah J.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2012, 21 (12) : 2167 - 2175