Instrumented anterior lumbar interbody fusion with equine bone protein extract

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Haisheng
Zou, Xuenong
Springer, Marco
Briest, Arne
Lind, Martin
Buenger, Cody
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Orthopaed Res Lab, Orthopaed Dept E, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] OSSACUR AG, Oberstenfeld, Germany
关键词
bone substitute; lumbar spine; spine fusion; porcine model; equine bone protein extract;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000255210.67616.2b
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Randomized and self-controlled study with anterior lumbar interbody fusion in a porcine model. Objective. To determine the osteoinductive potential of an equine bone protein extract in anterior interbody spinal fusion. Summary of Background Data. Interbody spinal fusion with bone graft transplantation is a common spine procedure. Complications related to bone graft harvesting are still a major concern. Equine demineralized bone matrix has been reported to be osteoinductive. However, the application of equine bone protein extract in spine fusion has not been documented. In this experiment, we evaluated equine bone protein extract in a porcine spinal fusion model. Methods. Due to their size and availability, we chose 12 normal Danish landrace pigs, each weighing 50 kg, as our experimental animals. Lumbar spine interbody fusion of L3/4, L4/5 using titanium alloy cages and pedicle screws instrumentation was performed on each pig. Cages packed with either autograft or equine bone protein extract (COLLOSS (R) E; OSSACUR AG, Oberstenfeld, Germany) were randomly assigned to the 2 levels anteriorly. The pigs were followed for 3 months. After sacrifice, radiograph, microcomputed tomography, and histomorphometry were used to evaluate the spine segments. Results. All pigs went through the observation without major complications. Radiograph examination after 12 weeks revealed no implant breakage, loosening, or spinal deformity. Microcomputed tomography scanning showed that cages with COLLOSS (R) E had the same fusion rate (11/12) as those with autograft. Three-dimensional evaluation from microcomputed tomography found a significant difference only in trabecular thickness; trabeculae from COLLOSS (R) E-filled cages were much thinner (P = 0.04). Histologic evaluations demonstrated longitudinally formed bone trabeculae in both autograft and COLLOSS (R) E-filled cages. Bone volume calculation from histomorphometry correlates well with that from microcomputed tomography results (R = 0.5; P = 0.01). Conclusion. In this porcine model, COLLOSS (R) E is as effective as autograft for anterior spinal fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:E126 / E129
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion
    S. S. Madan
    N. R. Boeree
    European Spine Journal, 2003, 12 : 567 - 575
  • [2] Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion
    Madan, SS
    Boeree, NR
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (06) : 567 - 575
  • [3] Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion - Results and comparison with anterior interbody fusion
    Greenough, CG
    Peterson, MD
    Hadlow, S
    Fraser, RD
    SPINE, 1998, 23 (04) : 479 - 486
  • [4] Different mechanisms of spinal fusion using equine bone protein extract, rhBMP-2 and autograft during the process of anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Zou, Xuenong
    Zou, Lijin
    Foldager, Casper
    Bendtsen, Michael
    Feng, Wenzhou
    Buenger, Cody E.
    BIOMATERIALS, 2009, 30 (06) : 991 - 1004
  • [5] Differences in early osteogenesis and bone micro-architecture in anterior lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2, equine bone protein extract, and autograft
    Foldager, Casper
    Bendtsen, Michael
    Nygaard, Jens Vinge
    Zou, Xuenong
    Bunger, Cody
    BONE, 2009, 45 (02) : 267 - 273
  • [6] Experimental anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an osteoinductive bovine bone collagen extract
    Li, HS
    Zou, XN
    Woo, C
    Ding, M
    Lind, M
    Bünger, C
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (08) : 890 - 896
  • [7] Bone dowels in anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Lekovic, Gregory P.
    Han, Patrick P.
    Kenny, Kathy J.
    Dickman, Curtis A.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2007, 20 (05): : 374 - 379
  • [8] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as an Adjunct to Posterior Instrumented Correction of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
    Crandall, Dennis G.
    Revella, Jan
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (20) : 2126 - 2133
  • [9] Bone Graft Substitutes for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    Chung, Mina
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 5 (02) : 77 - 85
  • [10] Combined anterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumented posterolateral fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: indication and surgical outcomes
    Hsieh, Ming-Kai
    Chen, Lih-Huei
    Niu, Chi-Chien
    Fu, Tsai-Sheng
    Lai, Po-Liang
    Chen, Wen-Jer
    BMC SURGERY, 2015, 15