Do government-experienced auditors reduce audit quality?

被引:5
|
作者
Ocak, Murat [1 ]
Can, Gokberk [2 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Edirne, Turkey
[2] Amer Univ Middle East, Coll Business Adm, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Government-experienced auditors; Overall experience; Audit quality; Aggressiveness; Reporting lag; Discretionary accruals; Auditor characteristics; Turkey; Borsa Istanbul; M40; M41; M42; M49; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; INDIVIDUAL AUDITORS; INDUSTRY EXPERTISE; PARTNER TENURE; BIG; IMPACT; IDENTIFICATION; INDEPENDENCE; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1108/MAJ-12-2017-1756
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose Recent studies regarding auditor experience generally focus on auditor overall experience in accounting, auditing, finance and related fields (Hardies et al., 2014), auditor sector and domain experience (Bedard and Biggs, 1991; Hammersley, 2006), auditor experience as CPA (Ye et al., 2014; Sonu et al., 2016) or big N experience (Chi and Huang, 2005; Gul et al., 2013; Zimmerman, 2016) or auditors' international working experience (Chen et al., 2017). But there is little attention paid to where auditors obtained their experience from? And how do auditors with government experience affect audit quality (AQ)? This paper aims to present the effect of auditors with government experience on AQ. Design/methodology/approach The authors used Turkish publicly traded firms in Borsa Istanbul between the year 2008 and 2015 to test the hypothesis. The sample comprises 1,067 observations and eight years. Two main proxies of government experience are used in this paper. The first proxy is auditor's government experience in the past. The second proxy is the continuous variable which is "the logarithmic value of the number of years of government experience". Further, auditor overall experience in auditing, accounting, finance and other related fields are also used as a control variable. Audit reporting aggressiveness, audit reporting lag and discretionary accruals are used as proxies of AQ. Besides this, the authors adopted the model to estimate the probability of selecting a government-experienced auditor, and they presented the regression results with the addition of inverse Mills ratio. Findings The main findings are consistent with conjecture. Government-experienced auditors do not enhance AQ. They are aggressive, and they complete audit work slowly and they cannot detect discretionary accruals effectively. Spending more time in a government agency makes them more aggressive and slow, and they do not detect earnings management practices. The Heckman estimation results regarding the variable of interest are also consistent with the main estimation results. In addition, the authors found in predicting government-experienced auditor choice that family firms, domestic firms and firms that reported losses (larger firms, older firms) are more (less) likely to choose government-experienced auditors. Originality/value This paper tries to fill the gap in the literature regarding the effect of auditor experience on AQ and concentrates on a different type of experience: Auditors with government experience.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 748
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IQ and Audit Quality: Do Smarter Auditors Deliver Better Audits?
    Kallunki, Jenni
    Kallunki, Juha-Pekka
    Niemi, Lasse
    Nilsson, Henrik
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (03) : 1373 - 1416
  • [2] Auditors' Trust in Audit Committees and Audit Quality
    Adelopo, Ismail
    Cheung, Kwok Yip
    Zaman, Mahbub
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2024,
  • [3] Do Social Ties between External Auditors and Audit Committee Members Affect Audit Quality?
    He, Xianjie
    Pittman, Jeffrey A.
    Rui, Oliver M.
    Wu, Donghui
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 92 (05): : 61 - 87
  • [4] Do big 4 auditors provide more timely audit after controlling for audit quality?
    Lin, Shu
    Hao, Lizhong
    Liu, Shengqiang
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2025, 40 (03) : 328 - 353
  • [5] Do key audit matters (KAMs) matter? Auditors' perceptions of KAMs and audit quality in Finland
    Rautiainen, Antti
    Saastamoinen, Jani
    Pajunen, Kati
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2021, 36 (03) : 386 - 404
  • [6] Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data
    Gul, Ferdinand A.
    Wu, Donghui
    Yang, Zhifeng
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2013, 88 (06): : 1993 - 2023
  • [7] Do Shared Auditors Improve Audit Quality? Evidence from Banking Relationships
    Ton, Karen
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2023, 98 (01): : 423 - 451
  • [8] Remote Audit Quality, Audit Efficiency, and Auditors' ' Job Satisfaction: Implications for Audit Firms and External Auditors
    Li, Yueqi
    Goel, Sanjay
    Williams, Kevin J.
    CURRENT ISSUES IN AUDITING, 2024, 18 (02): : P20 - P28
  • [9] Diversity of Signing Auditors and Audit Quality
    He, Chang
    Li, Chao Kevin
    Monroe, Gary S.
    Si, Yi
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2021, 40 (03): : 27 - 52
  • [10] Auditors' hometown ties and audit quality
    Deng, Yingwen
    Zhang, Ziyi
    Liu, Yunjing
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 42 (06)