Interindividual differences in response to plant-based diets: implications for cancer risk

被引:90
|
作者
Lampe, Johanna W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Nutr Sci Program, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
来源
关键词
MAMMALIAN LIGNANS ENTEROLACTONE; CYTOCHROME-P450; 1A2; VEGETARIAN DIETS; ISOTHIOCYANATE; METABOLISM; LIVER; FOOD; POLYMORPHISMS; CONSUMPTION; QUERCETIN;
D O I
10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736D
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Genetic differences in taste preference, food tolerance, and phytochemical absorption and metabolism all potentially influence the effect of plant-based diets on cancer risk. Diet is a mixture of carcinogens, mutagens, and protective agents, many of which are metabolized by biotransformation enzymes. Genetic polymorphisms that alter protein expression or enzyme function can modify risk. Genotypes associated with more favorable handling of carcinogens may be associated with less favorable handling of phytochemicals. For example, glutathione S-transferases detoxify polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and metabolize isothiocyanates, which are chemopreventive compounds in cruciferous vegetables. A polymorphism in the GSTM1 gene results in lack of GSTM1-1 protein. Pharmacokinetic studies suggest that lack of GSTM1 enzyme is associated with more rapid excretion of the isothiocyanate sulforaphane; therefore, individuals who have this genetic variation may derive less benefit from consuming cruciferous vegetables. Flavonoids are conjugated with glucuronide and sulfate and are excreted in urine and bile. Polymorphisms in UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and sulfotransferases may contribute to variability in phytochemical clearance and efficacy. Genetic polymorphisms in enzymes that metabolize phytochemicals may account in part for variation in disease risk and also have to be considered in the context of other aspects of human genetics, gut bacterial genetics, and environmental exposures. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89(suppl): 1553S-7S.
引用
收藏
页码:S1553 / S1557
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interindividual differences in response to cruciferous vegetable diets: Implications for cancer risk.
    Lampe, Johanna W.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 66 (08)
  • [2] Plant-Based Diets and Cancer Risk: What is the Evidence?
    Vanessa DeClercq
    Jacob T. Nearing
    Ellen Sweeney
    Current Nutrition Reports, 2022, 11 : 354 - 369
  • [3] Plant-Based Diets and Cancer Risk: What is the Evidence?
    DeClercq, Vanessa
    Nearing, Jacob T.
    Sweeney, Ellen
    CURRENT NUTRITION REPORTS, 2022, 11 (02) : 354 - 369
  • [4] Plant-based diets and colorectal cancer risk in Hawaii.
    LeMarchand, L
    Hankin, J
    Kolonel, L
    Wilkens, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 143 (11) : 249 - 249
  • [5] Response to "Plant-based diets and postprandial hyperkalemia"
    St-Jules, David E.
    Fouque, Denis
    NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2024, 82 (04) : 572 - 577
  • [6] Update on Plant-Based Diets and Cardiometabolic Risk
    Andrew Del Re
    Karen Aspry
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2022, 24 : 173 - 183
  • [7] The influence of plant-based diets on cardiovascular risk
    Franke, Katharina
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2024, 149 (05) : 206 - 206
  • [8] Update on Plant-Based Diets and Cardiometabolic Risk
    Del Re, Andrew
    Aspry, Karen
    CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2022, 24 (03) : 173 - 183
  • [9] Plant-based diets and bone health: nutritional implications
    Anderson, JJB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1999, 70 (03): : 539S - 542S
  • [10] Plant-Based Diets
    Tompkins, Elizabeth K.
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2012, 16 (02) : 277 - +