Using Semantic Relationships among Objects for Geospatial Land Use Classification

被引:0
|
作者
Rotich, Gilbert [1 ]
Aakur, Sathyanarayanan [1 ]
Minetto, Rodrigo [2 ]
Segundo, Mauricio Pamplona [3 ]
Sarkar, Sudeep [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Fed Univ Technol Parana UTFPR, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Bahia UFBA, Salvador, BA, Brazil
关键词
Remote sensing; convolutional neural networks; pattern theory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The geospatial land recognition is often cast as a local-region based classification problem. We show in this work, that prior knowledge, in terms of global semantic relationships among detected regions, allows us to leverage semantics and visual features to enhance land use classification in aerial imagery. To this end, we first estimate the top-k labels for each region using an ensemble of CNNs called Hydra. Twelve different models based on two state-of-the-art CNN architectures, ResNet and DenseNet, compose this ensemble. Then, we use Grenander's canonical pattern theory formalism coupled with the common-sense knowledge base, ConceptNet, to impose context constraints on the labels obtained by deep learning algorithms. These constraints are captured in a multi-graph representation involving generators and bonds with a flexible topology, unlike an MRF or Bayesian networks, which have fixed structures. Minimizing the energy of this graph representation results in a graphical representation of the semantics in the given image. We show our results on the recent fMoW challenge dataset. It consists of 1,047,691 images with 62 different classes of land use, plus a false detection category. The biggest improvement in performance with the use of semantics was for false detections. Other categories with significantly improved performance were: zoo, nuclear power plant, park, police station, and space facility. For the subset of fMow images with multiple bounding boxes the accuracy is 72.79% without semantics and 74.06% with semantics. Overall, without semantic context, the classification performance was 77.04%. With semantics, it reached 77.98%. Considering that less than 20% of the dataset contained more than one ROI for context, this is a significant improvement that shows the promise of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A hierarchical deep learning framework for the consistent classification of land use objects in geospatial databases
    Yang, Chun
    Rottensteiner, Franz
    Heipke, Christian
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 177 : 38 - 56
  • [2] A comprehensive methodology for discovering semantic relationships among geospatial vocabularies using oceanographic data discovery as an example
    Jiang, Yongyao
    Li, Yun
    Yang, Chaowei
    Liu, Kai
    Armstrong, Edward M.
    Huang, Thomas
    Moroni, David F.
    Finch, Christopher J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2017, 31 (11) : 2310 - 2328
  • [3] A NEW RECOMMENDATION METHOD BASED ON SEMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG OBJECTS
    Wang Qing-Xian
    Xu Chang-Zheng
    Cao Rong-Rong
    INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING SYSTEMS, VOL. 2, 2010, : 655 - 660
  • [4] Perceptions of land use and land cover analysed using geospatial data
    Saldias, Daisy San Martin
    Guzman Aguayo, Liliana
    Wallace, Luke
    Reinke, Karin
    McLennan, Blythe
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 146
  • [5] Assessment of Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics Using Geospatial Techniques
    Pandi, Dinagarapandi
    Kothandaraman, Saravanan
    Kumarasamy, Muthukrishna
    Kuppusamy, Mohan
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2022, 31 (03): : 2779 - 2786
  • [6] Analytical study on the relationship among land surface temperature, land use/land cover and spectral indices using geospatial techniques
    Atul K. Tiwari
    Rolee Kanchan
    Discover Environment, 2 (1):
  • [7] Interpretation and automatic integration of geospatial data into the Semantic WebTowards a process of automatic geospatial data interpretation, classification and integration using semantic technologies
    Claire Prudhomme
    Timo Homburg
    Jean-Jacques Ponciano
    Frank Boochs
    Christophe Cruz
    Ana-Maria Roxin
    Computing, 2020, 102 : 365 - 391
  • [8] Use of Geospatial Analyses for Semantic Reasoning
    Karmacharya, Ashish
    Cruz, Christophe
    Boochs, Frank
    Marzani, Franck
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT I, 2010, 6276 : 576 - +
  • [9] Semantic and Functional Relationships Among Objects Increase the Capacity of Visual Working Memory
    O'Donnell, Ryan E.
    Clement, Andrew
    Brockmole, James R.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2018, 44 (07) : 1151 - 1158
  • [10] Semantic segmentation for simultaneous crop and land cover land use classification using multi-temporal Landsat imagery
    Ebrahimi, Saman
    Kumar, Saurav
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 37