Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online alternative to face-to-face consultation in general practice: a mixed-methods study of webGP in six Devon practices

被引:31
|
作者
Carter, Mary [1 ]
Fletcher, Emily [1 ]
Sansom, Anna [1 ]
Warren, Fiona C. [1 ]
Campbell, John L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Primary Care Res Grp, Exeter, Devon, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
SECURE MESSAGES; OFFICE VISITS; PRIMARY-CARE; EVISITS; USERS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018688
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of webGP as piloted by six general practices. Methods Mixed-methods evaluation, including data extraction from practice databases, general practitioner (GP) completion of case reports, patient questionnaires and staff interviews. Setting General practices in NHS Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group's area approximately 6 months after implementing webGP (February-July 2016). Participants Six practices provided consultations data; 20 GPs completed case reports (regarding 61 e-consults); 81 patients completed questionnaires; 5 GPs and 5 administrators were interviewed. Outcome measures Attitudes and experiences of practice staff and patients regarding webGP. Results WebGP uptake during the evaluation was small, showing no discernible impact on practice workload. The completeness of cross-sectional data on consultation workload varied between practices. GPs judged 41/61 (72%) of webGP requests to require a face-to-face or telephone consultation. Introducing webGP appeared to be associated with shifts in responsibility and workload between practice staff and between practices and patients. 81/231 patients completed a postal survey (35.1% response rate). E-Consulters were somewhat younger and more likely to be employed than face-to-face respondents. WebGP appeared broadly acceptable to patients regarding timeliness and quality/experience of care provided. Similar problems were presented by all respondents. Both groups appeared equally familiar with other practice online services; e-consulters were somewhat more likely to have used them. From semistructured staff interviews, it appeared that, while largely acceptable within practice, introducing e-consults had potential for adverse interactions with pre-existing practice systems. Conclusions There is potential to assess the impact of new systems on consultation patterns by extracting routine data from practice databases. Staff and patients noticed subtle changes to responsibilities associated with online options. Greater uptake requires good communication between practice and patients, and organisation of systems to avoid conflicts and misuse. Further research is required to evaluate the full potential of webGP in managing practice workload.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study
    Atherton, Helen
    Brant, Heather
    Ziebland, Sue
    Bikker, Annemieke
    Campbell, John
    Gibson, Andy
    McKinstry, Brian
    Porqueddu, Tania
    Salisbury, Chris
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (669): : E293 - E300
  • [2] Is Online Group Therapy as Effective as Face-to-face Group Therapy? A Mixed Methods Study
    Zhang, Ji
    Hu, Huinan
    Wu, Dazhou
    Nie, Yuxiu
    Lin, Xiuyun
    CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2024, 53 (2) : 208 - 219
  • [3] Professionalism in small group learning between face-to-face and virtual settings: a mixed-methods study
    Song, Xiaomei
    Elftman, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 14 : 36 - 42
  • [4] Face-to-face and online teaching experience on experimental animals and alternative methods with nursing students: a research study
    Sierra, Juan F. Garcia F.
    Martinez, M. Nelida Fernandez
    Cadenas, Cristina Lopez
    Laiz, Raquel Diez
    Lago, Jose M. Rodriguez
    Prieto, Ana M. Sahagun M.
    BMC NURSING, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [5] Face-to-face and online teaching experience on experimental animals and alternative methods with nursing students: a research study
    Juan F. Garcia Sierra
    M. Nélida Fernandez Martinez
    Cristina Lopez Cadenas
    Raquel Diez Laiz
    José M. Rodriguez Lago
    Ana M. Sahagun Prieto
    BMC Nursing, 22
  • [6] Understanding the benefits and limitations of mixing virtual and face-to-face consultations to outpatient palliative care services; a mixed-methods study
    Morris, Caradoc
    Waterman, David
    Henson, Lesley Anne
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 23 (01):
  • [7] Perceived positive social interdependence in online versus face-to-face team-based learning styles of collaborative learning: a randomized, controlled, mixed-methods study
    Shimizu, Ikuo
    Matsuyama, Yasushi
    Duvivier, Robbert
    van der Vleuten, Cees
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Perceived positive social interdependence in online versus face-to-face team-based learning styles of collaborative learning: a randomized, controlled, mixed-methods study
    Ikuo Shimizu
    Yasushi Matsuyama
    Robbert Duvivier
    Cees van der Vleuten
    BMC Medical Education, 22
  • [9] Integrated virtual simulation and face-to-face simulation for clinical judgment training among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed-methods study
    Jian Yang
    Wen Jie Zhou
    Si Chen Zhou
    Dan Luo
    Qian Liu
    Ai-Ling Wang
    Si-Hong Yu
    Xiao-Ping Zhu
    Xue Yu He
    Fen Hu
    Bing Xiang Yang
    Jie Chen
    BMC Medical Education, 24
  • [10] Integrated virtual simulation and face-to-face simulation for clinical judgment training among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed-methods study
    Yang, Jian
    Zhou, Wen Jie
    Zhou, Si Chen
    Luo, Dan
    Liu, Qian
    Wang, Ai-Ling
    Yu, Si-Hong
    Zhu, Xiao-Ping
    He, Xue Yu
    Hu, Fen
    Yang, Bing Xiang
    Chen, Jie
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)