The Association of Episiotomy with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury-A Population Based Matched Cohort Study

被引:24
|
作者
Raisanen, Sari [1 ,2 ]
Selander, Tuomas [3 ]
Cartwright, Rufus [4 ]
Gissler, Mika [5 ,6 ]
Kramer, Michael R. [1 ]
Laine, Katariina [7 ,8 ]
Heinonen, Seppo [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[3] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Sci, Serv Ctr, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, England
[5] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf THL, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Nord Sch Publ Hlth, Gothenburg, Sweden
[7] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet, Ulleval, Norway
[8] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[9] Univ Eastern Finland, Sch Med, Kuopio, Finland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 09期
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; RISK-FACTORS; VAGINAL DELIVERY; ROUTINE; QUALITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0107053
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives: To estimate the independent association of episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) using first a cross-sectional and then a matched pair analysis. Design: A matched cohort. Setting: Data was gathered from the Finnish Medical Birth Register from 2004-2011. Population: All singleton vaginal births (n = 303,758). Methods: Women resulting matched pairs (n = 63,925) were matched based on baseline risk of OASIS defined based on parity (first or second/subsequent vaginal births), age, birth weight, mode of delivery, prior caesarean section, and length of active second stage of birth. Results: In cross-sectional analysis episiotomy was associated with a 12% lower incidence of OASIS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 0.98) in first vaginal births and with a 132% increased incidence of OASIS in second or subsequent vaginal births (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.03). In matched pair analysis episiotomy was associated with a 23% (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.86) lower incidence of OASIS in first vaginal births and a 61% (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.29) increased incidence of OASIS in second or subsequent vaginal births compared to women who gave birth without an episiotomy. The matched pair analysis showed a 12.5% and a 31.6% reduction in aORs of OASIS associated with episiotomy, respectively. Conclusions: A matched pair analysis showed a substantial reduction in the aORs of OASIS with episiotomy, due to confounding by indication. This indicates that results of observational studies evaluating an association between episiotomy and OASIS should be interpreted with caution.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study
    Muraca, Giulia M.
    Liu, Shiliang
    Sabr, Yasser
    Lisonkova, Sarka
    Skoll, Amanda
    Brant, Rollin
    Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
    Stephansson, Olof
    Razaz, Neda
    Joseph, K. S.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2019, 191 (42) : E1149 - E1158
  • [2] Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury?
    Revicky, Vladimir
    Nirmal, Daisy
    Mukhopadhyay, Sambit
    Morris, Edward P.
    Nieto, Jose J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 150 (02) : 142 - 146
  • [3] Hospital-based lateral episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury rates: a retrospective population-based register study
    Raisanen, Sari
    Vehvilainen-Julkunen, Katri
    Gissler, Mika
    Heinonen, Seppo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04) : 347.e1 - 347.e6
  • [4] Obstetric anal sphincter injury risk factors and the role of the mediolateral episiotomy
    Twidale, Emily
    Cornell, Kristin
    Litzow, Nicholas
    Hotchin, Anne
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 53 (01): : 17 - 20
  • [5] Anal sphincter injury and episiotomy
    Goer, Henci
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2006, 33 (04):
  • [6] EFFECT OF EPISIOTOMY RATE ON THE ASSOCIATION OF EPISIOTOMY AND OBSTETRIC ANAL SPHINCTER INJURY - RESULTS OF A POPULATION-WIDE NATURAL EXPERIMENT IN FINLAND 1997-2011
    Raisanen, S.
    Gissler, M.
    Cartwright, R.
    Laine, K.
    Jouhki, M.
    Heinonen, S.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 : S67 - S68
  • [7] Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study
    Jango, Hanna
    Langhoff-Roos, Jens
    Rosthoj, Susanne
    Sakse, Abelone
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : 59.e1 - 59.e6
  • [8] Prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injuries with perineal support and lateral episiotomy: A historical cohort study
    Eggebo, Torbjorn M.
    Rygh, Astrid Betten
    von Brandis, Phillip
    Skjeldestad, Finn Egil
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 103 (03) : 488 - 497
  • [9] OBSTETRIC ANAL SPHINCTER INJURY IN OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY: MEDIOLATERAL, MEDIAN OR NO EPISIOTOMY ?
    Khalifeh, A.
    Walsh, C.
    Fagan, M.
    Mcauliffe, F.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 : S69 - S69
  • [10] Obstetric anal sphincter injury
    Abbott, Danielle
    Atere-Roberts, Natalie
    Williams, Andrew
    Oteng-Ntim, Eugene
    Chappell, Lucy C.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 : 140 - 145