Establishing clinically significant outcome thresholds for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:27
|
作者
Cohn, Matthew R. [1 ]
Kunze, Kyle N. [1 ]
Polce, Evan M. [1 ]
Nemsick, Michael [1 ]
Garrigues, Grant E. [1 ]
Forsythe, Brian [1 ]
Nicholson, Gregory P. [1 ]
Cole, Brian J. [1 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Midwest Orthoped Rush, Dept Orthoped, Div Sports Med & Shoulder, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Clinical outcomes; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE); total shoulder arthroplasty; minimal clinically important difference (MCID); substantial clinical benefit (SCB); patient-reported outcome instrument validation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) is a simple, time-efficient patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) used to assess postoperative shoulder function. Clinically significant outcome values and ability to correlate with longer legacy PROM scores at 2 years following shoulder arthroplasty are unknown. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using SANE, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Constant scores that were collected at a minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 153 patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) were included. A distribution-based method was used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). An anchor-based method was used to determine substantial clinical benefit (SCB). The following anchor question was collected alongside the PROMs and graded on a 15-point Lik-ert-type scale to establish the SCB: "Since your surgery, has there been any change in the pain in your shoulder?'' Linear regression was used to assess correlations between PROMs. Results: SANE showed moderate correlation with ASES (R-2 = 0.493) and Constant (R-2 = 0.586) scores (P < .001). The MCID value was 14.9, and the SCB absolute value was 80.4 (area under the curve = 0.663) for SANE. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that patients undergoing RTSA were less likely to achieve SCB on all 3 outcome measures (P < .02). Conclusions: This study establishes concurrent construct validity for SANE and suggests that it is a valid metric to assess the MCID and SCB at 2 years following anatomic TSA and RTSA. SANE demonstrated moderate correlations with ASES and Constant scores. Patients undergoing RTSA demonstrated a lower propensity to achieve SCB at 2 years postoperatively compared with anatomic TSA. (C) 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E137 / E146
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a reliable metric to measure clinically significant improvements following shoulder arthroplasty
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Charles, Michael D.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Lalehzarian, Simon P.
    Cabarcas, Brandon C.
    Manderle, Brandon J.
    Nicholson, Gregory P.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (11) : 2238 - 2246
  • [2] Clinically significant outcome thresholds and rates of achievement by shoulder arthroplasty type and preoperative diagnosis
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Moverman, Michael A.
    Glass, Evan A.
    Swanson, Daniel P.
    Bowler, Adam R.
    Le, Kiet
    Kirsch, Jacob M.
    Lohre, Ryan
    Jawa, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (07) : 1448 - 1456
  • [3] Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients Younger Than 60 Years Old Exhibit Lower Clinically Significant Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Scores Compared to Older Patients
    Stewart, Brendan P.
    Hawthorne, Benjamin C.
    Dorsey, Caitlin G.
    Wellington, Ian J.
    Cote, Mark
    Mazzocca, Augustus
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [4] Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) be used as a stand-alone outcome instrument in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty?
    Baumgarten, Keith M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (09) : E426 - E435
  • [5] Establishing clinically significant outcomes of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity questionnaire after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Haunschild, Eric D.
    Condron, Nolan B.
    Gilat, Ron
    Fu, Michael C.
    Wolfson, Theodore
    Garrigues, Grant E.
    Nicholson, Gregory
    Forsythe, Brian
    Verma, Nikhil
    Cole, Brian J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (10) : 2231 - 2239
  • [6] Development of supervised machine learning algorithms for prediction of satisfaction at 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty
    Polce, Evan M.
    Kunze, Kyle N.
    Fu, Michael C.
    Garrigues, Grant E.
    Forsythe, Brian
    Nicholson, Gregory P.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (06) : E290 - E299
  • [7] Preoperative ASES Scores Can Predict Substantial Clinical Benefit at 2 Years Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Chang, Brenda
    Nguyen, Joseph
    Gulotta, Lawrence, V
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 44 (04) : E509 - +
  • [8] Does the Relationship Between Preoperative Function and Achievement of Clinically Important Benchmarks of Success After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Depend on Outcome Assessment Design?
    Hao, Kevin A.
    Hones, Keegan M.
    O'Keefe, Daniel S.
    Elwell, Josie
    Simovitch, Ryan W.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    King, Joseph J.
    Schoch, Bradley S.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2025, 483 (03) : 377 - 395
  • [9] Preoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score Predicts Poor Outcomes After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Without Arthritis
    Kirsch, Jacob M.
    Patel, Manan
    Hill, Brian W.
    McPartland, Connor
    Namdari, Surena
    Lazarus, Mark D.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 45 (04) : 215 - 220
  • [10] Single-stage revision for total shoulder arthroplasty infection. Results at a minimum 2 years follow-up
    Hollier-Larousse, Bernard
    Hardy, Alexandre
    El Sayed, Faten
    Roux, Anne-Laure
    Menigaux, Christophe
    Bauer, Thomas
    Werthel, Jean-David
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2024, 110 (05)