The effect of frontoparietal paired associative stimulation on decision-making and working memory

被引:19
|
作者
Nord, Camilla L. [1 ,2 ]
Popa, Traian [3 ,4 ]
Smith, Emma [1 ]
Hannah, Ricci [5 ]
Donamayor, Nuria [1 ,6 ]
Weidacker, Kathrin [1 ]
Bays, Paul M. [7 ]
Rothwell, John [5 ]
Voon, Valerie [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, MRC Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England
[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Ctr Neuroprosthet, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] NINDS, NIH, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] UCL, Sobell Ctr Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London, England
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
[7] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, England
[8] Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Fdn Trust, Cambridge, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Paired associative stimulation; Decision-making; Habitual; Goal-directed; Psychiatry; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; CORTEX; PARIETAL; COMPULSIVITY; PLASTICITY; NETWORKS; PROTECTS; REWARDS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2019.03.015
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous single-site neurostimulation experiments have unsuccessfully attempted to shift decision-making away from habitual control, a fast, inflexible cognitive strategy, towards goal-directed control, a flexible, though computationally expensive strategy. We employed a dual-target neurostimulation approach in 30 healthy participants, using cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation (ccPAS) to target two key nodes: lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS), to test whether decision-making can be artificially shifted from habitual toward goal-directed control. Participants received three active stimulations, delivered at least six days apart (each involving 100 paired pulses over the IPS and LPFC, varying the interstimulus interval): two interventional, time-relevant ccPAS (10 msec interval) and one control, non-time-relevant ccPAS (100 msec interval). Following stimulation, participants completed a sequential learning task, measuring goal-directed/habitual control, and a working memory task. IPS -> LPFC ccPAS (stimulating IPS, then LPFC with a 10 msec interval) shifted decision-making from habitual toward goal-directed control, compared to control ccPAS. There was no effect of LPFC -> IPS ccPAS, nor an effect of any PAS condition on working memory. Previous studies have shown ccPAS effects outside the motor domain targeting prefrontal regions on response inhibition, attentional bias, and alpha asymmetry. The present study measures the behavioural effects of parietal-prefrontal PAS, focusing on a highly complex decision-making task and working memory. If confirmed in larger studies, this would be the first instance of neurostimulation successfully shifting decision-making from habitual to goal-directed control, putatively via inducing long-term potentiation between the IPS and LPFC. However, we found no effect in the other direction (LPFC -> ccPAS), and no effect on working memory overall. PAS is a relatively new neuromodulatory technique in the cognitive arsenal, and this study could help guide future approaches in healthy and disordered decision-making. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 276
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Working Memory and Decision-Making in a Frontoparietal Circuit Model
    Murray, John D.
    Jaramillo, Jorge
    Wang, Xiao-Jing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 37 (50): : 12167 - 12186
  • [2] The Role of Working Memory for Adolescent Decision-Making
    ALMY, B.
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2022, 36 (04) : 764 - 765
  • [3] Is it random or impulsive responding? The effect of working memory load on decision-making
    Hatfield-Eldred, Maegan R.
    Skeel, Reid L.
    Reilly, Mark P.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 27 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [4] Decision-making performance of multiple weighted bidirectional associative memory
    Xia, Kaijun
    Chen, Songcan
    Nanjing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2000, 32 (06): : 625 - 630
  • [5] Working memory capacity and cognitive styles in decision-making
    Fletcher, Jennifer M.
    Marks, Anthony D. G.
    Hine, Donald W.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 50 (07) : 1136 - 1141
  • [6] The Effects of Age, Priming, and Working Memory on Decision-Making
    Wood, Meagan
    Black, Sheila
    Gilpin, Ansley
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (01):
  • [7] Dissociation of working memory from decision-making in schizophrenia
    Kweon, Ys.
    Lee, K. U.
    Lee, S. J.
    Kim, Y. T.
    Kim, S. H.
    Jeung, S. H.
    Lee, H. K.
    Lee, J. T.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 16 : S443 - S444
  • [8] The effect of working memory load on inattentional deafness during aeronautical decision-making
    Zhu, Rongjuan
    Ma, Xiaoliang
    You, Xuqun
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2023, 113
  • [9] Arousal, Working Memory Capacity, and Sexual Decision-Making in Men
    Spokes, Tara
    Hine, Donald W.
    Marks, Anthony D. G.
    Quain, Peter
    Lykins, Amy D.
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 43 (06) : 1137 - 1148
  • [10] The impact of working memory capacity on intuitive decision-making in sport
    Seidel-Marzi, Oliver
    Canal-Bruland, Rouwen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2025,