Clinical research in oncology. Are patient safety and data acquisition compatible?

被引:0
|
作者
Illhardt, F. J. [1 ]
Unger, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Albert Ludwigs Univ, Eth Kommiss, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Klin Tumorbiol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
来源
ONKOLOGE | 2009年 / 15卷 / 10期
关键词
Vulnerability; Equipoise; Data (Safety) Monitoring Committee; Publication; Pallitive medicine; TRIALS; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00761-009-1694-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Oncological research is concerned with developing new substances, new chemotherapeutical combinations, dietetics, psychology, retrieval of data, immunomodulation and accommodation. All these research areas show a conflict between the safety of patients and the retrieval of data. Models for a solution are 1) the exclusion of a not yet established medicine which benefits the interests of patients and 2) the analysis and balancing which covers both approaches without exclusion. Balance is the preferred model because it allows developments which support the safety of patients. What these conflicts consist of and what leads to a solution from an ethical standpoint is discussed in the following issues: vulnerability, informed consent, the principle of equipoise (ratio of preferring interests), data monitoring committees, publication and research in fields of palliative medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Klinische Forschung in der OnkologieSind Patientensicherheit und Erkenntnisgewinn vereinbar?Clinical research in oncologyAre patient safety and data acquisition compatible?
    F.J. Illhardt
    C. Unger
    Der Onkologe, 2009, 15 (10): : 989 - 996
  • [2] Patient Safety & Risk Analysis in Radiation Oncology. The MARRTA Project
    Pardo, J.
    Ferrer, C.
    Prieto, C.
    Perez, A.
    Ramirez, M. L.
    Rot, M. J.
    Ruiz, S.
    Vazquez, V.
    Sanchez, C.
    Suarez, M. J.
    Vilanova, J.
    Delgado, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E208 - E209
  • [3] Patient Safety & Quality Control Working Group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology.
    Pardo-Masferrer, J.
    Del Cerro-Penalver, E.
    Jimenez-Jimenez, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S927 - S927
  • [4] Use of machine learning to identify relevant research publications in clinical oncology.
    Saiz, Fernando Jose Suarez
    Sanders, Corey
    Stevens, Rick J.
    Nielsen, Robert
    Britt, Michael W.
    Preininger, Anita
    Jackson, Gretchen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [5] Defining the patient experience in medical oncology.
    Odai-Afotey, Ashley
    Kliss, Andrea
    Hafler, Janet
    Sanft, Tara B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (30)
  • [6] An analysis of methodologic quality in survey research reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
    Tamarelli, Carrie M.
    Howell, David D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [7] Tumor volume analysis in clinical oncology.
    Gordon, A. B.
    Stebbing, J.
    Coombes, C.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (02) : 258S - 258S
  • [8] From patient generated data to precision medicine: An example of a patient-centered application in oncology.
    Beutter, Chantal N. L.
    Martens, Uwe Marc
    Fegeler, Christian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [9] Leveraging real world data and AIML to inform smart patient care in oncology.
    Zhou, Li
    Steen, Rob
    Lu, Lynn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [10] Genetic diagnostics in oncology. Blessing or curse for the patient?
    Propping, P.
    ONKOLOGE, 2009, 15 (10): : 1015 - 1020