Effectiveness of forestry best management practices in the United States: Literature review

被引:168
|
作者
Cristan, Richard [1 ]
Aust, W. Michael [1 ]
Bolding, M. Chad [1 ]
Barrett, Scott M. [1 ]
Munsell, John F. [2 ]
Schilling, Erik [3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Forest Resources & Environm Conservat FREC, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, FREC, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] Natl Council Air & Stream Improvement Inc, Aubrey, TX 76227 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Forestry best management practices (BMPs); BMP effectiveness studies; Water quality; Sediment delivery; Erosion; Forest operations; WATER-QUALITY; TIMBER HARVEST; SEDIMENT REDUCTION; REDUCING SEDIMENT; STREAM CROSSINGS; ZONES; CREEK; MACROINVERTEBRATE; PATTERNS; LOSSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.025
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
In response to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (a.k.a., Clean Water Act) of 1972, forestry best management practices (BMPs) were developed and subsequently implemented to address NPS pollution during forest management. BMP guidelines vary by state and can be non-regulatory, quasi-regulatory, or regulatory. To determine how effective the guidelines for protecting water quality are, research literature relating to BMP effectiveness was evaluated. Forestry BMP effectiveness studies are often site or region specific. Therefore, BMP research in the United States was divided into three regions: northern, southern, and western. Thirty research studies were reviewed for the southern region with the majority being conducted in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain physiographic regions. The western region had thirty-one studies, most of which were in the Pacific Border physiographic region. The northern region had twenty studies primarily in the northeastern states. Forestry BMP effectiveness research generally focused on forest water quality from timber harvesting, site preparation, forest road construction and maintenance, stream crossings, and other categories of forest operations. The literature indicates that forestry BMPs protect water quality when constructed correctly and in adequate numbers. Forestry BMP effectiveness studies allow state forestry BMP programs to evaluate progress in reducing non-point source pollution and achieving water quality goals established under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Furthermore, states have used research findings to change BMPs and improve their guidelines. Although forestry BMPs have been proven to protect water quality, they are still being refined to enhance their performance. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 151
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effectiveness of Forestry Best Management Practices for Sediment Control in the Southeastern United States: A Literature Review
    Anderson, Christopher J.
    Lockaby, B. Graeme
    SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY, 2011, 35 (04): : 170 - 177
  • [2] Welfare effects of forestry best management practices in the United States
    Sun, Changyou
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2006, 36 (07) : 1674 - 1683
  • [3] Forestry Best Management Practices and Conservation of Aquatic Systems in the Southeastern United States
    Schilling, Erik B.
    Larsen-Gray, Angela L.
    Miller, Darren A.
    WATER, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [4] Symposium on Forestry Best Management Practice (BMP) Effectiveness in the Eastern United States
    Schilling, Erik B.
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2016, 114 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [5] Application and effectiveness of forestry best management practices in West Virginia
    Wang, Jingxin
    Goff, William A.
    NORTHERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY, 2008, 25 (01): : 32 - 37
  • [6] Efficiencies of Forestry Best Management Practices for Reducing Sediment and Nutrient Losses in the Eastern United States
    Edwards, Pamela J.
    Williard, Karl W. J.
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2010, 108 (05) : 245 - 249
  • [7] Impacts of Sustainable Forestry Initiative fiber sourcing on the forestry best management practices and biodiversity conservation in the SE United States
    Karnatz, Caroline
    Kadam, Parag
    Hamilton, Healy
    Smyth, Regan
    Bawa, Ranjit
    Dwivedi, Puneet
    TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE, 2023, 11
  • [8] The effectiveness of forestry best management practices at skidder stream crossings in Virginia
    Dangle, C. L.
    Aust, W. M.
    Bolding, M. C.
    Barrett, S. M.
    Schilling, E. B.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2019, 74 (03) : 199 - 208
  • [9] Inventory and Review of Existing Agricultural Best Management Practices for Pesticides in the United States
    Jacobson, Andy
    Guth, Nick
    Stone, Zechariah
    Desmarteau, Dean
    Brain, Richard
    ACS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 4 (05): : 567 - 579
  • [10] Effects of the sustainable forestry initiative fiber sourcing standard on the average implementation rate of forestry best management practices in Georgia, United States
    Dwivedi, Puneet
    Tumpach, Chantal
    Cook, Chase
    Izlar, Bob
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2018, 97 : 51 - 58