A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles

被引:83
作者
Leben, Derek [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, 450 Schoolhouse Rd, Johnstown, PA 15904 USA
关键词
Autonomous vehicles; Ethics; Rawls; Trolley problem;
D O I
10.1007/s10676-017-9419-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Autonomous vehicles must be programmed with procedures for dealing with trolley-style dilemmas where actions result in harm to either pedestrians or passengers. This paper outlines a Rawlsian algorithm as an alternative to the Utilitarian solution. The algorithm will gather the vehicle's estimation of probability of survival for each person in each action, then calculate which action a self-interested person would agree to if he or she were in an original bargaining position of fairness. I will employ Rawls' assumption that the Maximin procedure is what self-interested agents would use from an original position, and then show how the Maximin procedure can be operationalized to produce unique outputs over probabilities of survival.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 115
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Anderson M., 2004, AAAI 04 WORKSH AG OR
[2]  
Anderson M, 2011, MACHINE ETHICS
[3]  
Anderson S. L., 2011, HUM ROB INT ELD CAR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Natural Justice
[5]   The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles [J].
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois ;
Shariff, Azim ;
Rahwan, Iyad .
SCIENCE, 2016, 352 (6293) :1573-1576
[6]  
Gauthier David P., 1986, Morals by Agreement
[7]   CAN MAXIMIN PRINCIPLE SERVE AS A BASIS FOR MORALITY - CRITIQUE OF RAWLS,J THEORY [J].
HARSANYI, JC .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1975, 69 (02) :594-606
[8]  
Hobbes T., 1651, LEVIATHAN
[9]  
Lin P, 2012, INTELL ROBOT AUTON, P1
[10]  
Nord E., 1999, Cost-value Analysis in Health Care: Making Sense Out of QALYs