Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Should Be Preferred Over Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Local Staging and Disease Risk Classification

被引:27
|
作者
Soeterik, Timo F. W.
van Melick, Harm H. E.
Dijksman, Lea M.
Biesma, Douwe H.
Witjes, J. Alfred
van Basten, Jean-Paul A.
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Value Based Healthcare, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Urol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SURVIVAL; ACCURACY; BIOPSY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.089
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) local tumor staging on prostate cancer risk stratification and choice of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prostate cancer patients, newly diagnosed from 2017 to 2018 at 7 Dutch teaching hospitals were included. Risk group classification was done twice, using either digital rectal examination (DRE) or mp-MRI information. Risk group migration and rates of treatment intensification associated with mp-MRI upstaging were established. Diagnostic accuracy measures for the detection of nonorgan-confined disease (stage >= T3a), for both DRE and mp-MRI, were assessed in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. RESULTS A total of 1683 patients were included. Upstaging due to mp-MRI staging occurred in 493 of 1683 (29%) patients and downstaging in 43 of 1683 (3%) patients. Upstaging was associated with significant higher odds for treatment intensification (odds ratio [OR]: 3.5 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.5). Stage >= T3a on mp-MRI was the most common reason for risk group upstaging (77%). Sensitivity for the detection of stage >= T3a was higher for mp-MRI compared to DRE (51% vs 12%, P <.001), whereas specificity was lower (82% vs 97%, P <.001). Mp-MRI resulted in a significantly higher cumulative rate of true positive and true negative stage >= T3a predictions compared with DRE (67% vs 58%, P <.001). CONCLUSION Use of mp-MRI tumor stage for prostate cancer risk classification leads to upstaging in 1 of 3 patients. Mp-MRI enables superior detection of nonorgan-confined disease compared with DRE, and should be the preferred tool for determining clinical tumor stage. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 210
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging for T staging of prostate cancer
    Zhu, Junming
    Wu, Xiaohui
    Xue, Yuting
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zheng, Qingshui
    Xue, Xueyi
    Huang, Zhiyang
    Chen, Shaohao
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (04) : 1024 - 1030
  • [2] Staging of Prostate Cancer: Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Different Risk Classes
    Guerra, Francesco Saverio
    Eusebi, Laura
    Bartelli, Francesco
    Cecchini, Sara
    Paci, Enrico
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (04) : 216 - 224
  • [3] Clinical Impact and Statistical Significance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer
    Huebner, Nicolai A.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (02) : 186 - 187
  • [4] Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
    Brown, G
    Davies, S
    Williams, GT
    Bourne, MW
    Newcombe, RG
    Radcliffe, AG
    Blethyn, J
    Dallimore, NS
    Rees, BI
    Phillips, CJ
    Maughan, TS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [5] Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?
    G Brown
    S Davies
    G T Williams
    M W Bourne
    R G Newcombe
    A G Radcliffe
    J Blethyn
    N S Dallimore
    B I Rees
    C J Phillips
    T S Maughan
    British Journal of Cancer, 2004, 91 : 23 - 29
  • [6] Prostate Cancer Local Staging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lin, Yue
    Johnson, Latrice A.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (01) : 93 - 108
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for local staging of prostate cancer in a multicenter setting
    Oudshoorn F.H.K.
    Jansen B.H.E.
    Tijans A.M.
    Yska M.
    Lont A.P.
    Collette E.R.P.
    Klaver S.
    Vis A.N.
    Tijdschrift voor Urologie, 2018, 8 (5) : 76 - 80
  • [8] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: Current status in prostate cancer detection, localization, and staging
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 43 (04) : 303 - 313
  • [9] Out-of-bounds: The significance of extraprostatic extension on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer
    Huynh, Melissa
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (08): : 267 - 268
  • [10] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Hung, Siu-Wan
    Lin, Yen-Ting
    Liu, Ming-Cheng
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (06) : 266 - 276