Temporal integration of sensory evidence for saccade target selection

被引:16
|
作者
Ludwig, Casimir J. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Expt Psychol, Bristol BS8 1TU, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Decision-making; Computational model; Saccadic eye movements; Reaction time and choice; BRIGHTNESS-DISCRIMINATION TASK; PERCEPTUAL DECISION-MAKING; SIMPLE REACTION-TIME; RESPONSE-TIME; EYE-MOVEMENTS; HUMAN-VISION; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; 2-CHOICE DECISIONS; ACCUMULATOR MODEL; DIFFUSION-MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Perceptual decision-making may be viewed as a process of integrating sensory evidence over time to a response threshold. Ludwig et al. (2005b) argued against an integration to threshold account for saccadic eye movement decisions based on data from a stochastic contrast discrimination task. They argued that evidence integration was time-limited, with the deadline being independent from the quality of the sensory evidence. In this study, the data from Ludwig et al. (2005b) were fit with a model in which sensory evidence is integrated to a time-varying threshold. The functional form of the threshold variation allowed the model to approximate a constant threshold as well as an abrupt deadline. Sensory evidence was computed on the basis of a temporally blurred representation of the stimulus sequence. The model provides an overall good fit to the latency and accuracy data. Its predictions are consistent with a. short window of evidence integration, as proposed in the original study. The model produces qualitatively correct predictions for an experiment in which the availability of sensory evidence is varied systematically. Inspection of the model parameters, however, shows that integration was not terminated by an abrupt deadline, although a rather gradual deadline signal improved the fit for some observers. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2764 / 2773
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Saccade Target Selection Relies on Feedback Competitive Signal Integration
    Kalisvaart, Joke P.
    Noest, Andre J.
    van den Berg, Albert V.
    Goossens, Jeroen
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (29): : 12077 - 12089
  • [2] Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism
    Deubel, H
    Schneider, WX
    VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (12) : 1827 - 1837
  • [3] Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: Curved saccade trajectories
    Melanie C. Doyle
    Robin Walker
    Experimental Brain Research, 2002, 142 : 116 - 130
  • [4] Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
    Findlay, John M.
    Blythe, Hazel I.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (10) : 1267 - 1274
  • [5] Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: Curved saccade trajectories
    Doyle, MC
    Walker, R
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 142 (01) : 116 - 130
  • [6] Development of saccade target selection in infants
    Matsuzawa, M
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2001, 93 (01) : 115 - 123
  • [7] Spectral Signatures of Saccade Target Selection
    Carl, Christine
    Hipp, Joerg F.
    Koenig, Peter
    Engel, Andreas K.
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2016, 29 (01) : 130 - 148
  • [8] Spectral Signatures of Saccade Target Selection
    Christine Carl
    Joerg F. Hipp
    Peter König
    Andreas K. Engel
    Brain Topography, 2016, 29 : 130 - 148
  • [9] Saccade target selection in Chinese reading
    Li, Xingshan
    Liu, Pingping
    Rayner, Keith
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (02) : 524 - 530
  • [10] NEURAL BASIS OF SACCADE TARGET SELECTION
    SCHALL, JD
    REVIEWS IN THE NEUROSCIENCES, 1995, 6 (01) : 63 - 85