Thoracoscopic surgical ablation or catheter ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
|
作者
Yi, Shaolei [1 ]
Liu, Xiaojun [2 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Chen, Lianghua [1 ]
Yuan, Haitao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Shandong First Med Univ, 324 Jingwulu, Jinan 250010, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Zibo Cent, Dept Cardiol, Zibo, Peoples R China
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Thoracoscopic surgical ablation; HEART EPICARDIAL ABLATION; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; COX-MAZE PROCEDURE; HYBRID PROCEDURE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivaa203
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: There is an urgent need to understand the difference in the influence of thoracoscopic surgical ablation (TSA) and catheter ablation (CA) on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of TSA versus CA in patients with AF. METHODS: Databases including EMBASE, Clinical Trials, PubMed and Cochrane Central Registered Control System were screened for the retrieval of articles. A direct meta-analysis of TSA versus CA was conducted. The I-2 test analysis was performed to evaluate heterogeneity. The Begg-Mazumdar test and the Harbord-Egger test were used to detect publication bias. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia, while the primary safety outcome was severe adverse event (SAE) occurrence. RESULTS: Of the 860 identified articles, 6, comprising 466 participants, were finally included. The rate of freedom from AT was higher in the TSA group (75%) than in the CA group (57.1%) (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.85; P = 0.02; I-2 = 57%). A larger number of SAEs were observed in the TSA group than in the CA group (odds ratio 0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.006-0.46; P = 0.0006; I-2 = 44%). The result of the subgroup analysis of 3 studies that enrolled AF patients without a history of ablation showed that the incidence of AT was comparable in both arms. The ablation procedure and hospitalization durations were longer in the TSA arm. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, TSA was associated with better efficacy but a higher rate of SAEs compared to CA. In addition, TSA did not show better efficacy results as the first invasive procedure in the sub-analysis of patients with paroxysmal AF or early persistent AF. Therefore, doctors should recommend either TSA or CA to patients with AF after due consideration of the aforementioned findings.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 773
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SURGICAL VERSUS CATHETER ABLATION IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Rattanawong, Pattara
    Kewcharoen, Jakrin
    Kanitsoraphan, Chanavuth
    Vutthikraivit, Wasawat
    Shanbhag, Anusha
    Barry, Timothy
    Ko, Nway L. Ko
    Taweesedt, Pahnwat
    Shen, Win-Kuang
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 460 - 460
  • [2] Surgical versus catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Rattanawong, Pattara
    Kanitsoraphan, Chanavuth
    Kewcharoen, Jakrin
    Sriramoju, Anil
    Shanbhag, Anusha
    Ko Ko, Nway L.
    Barry, Timothy
    Vutthikraivit, Wasawat
    Shen, Win-Kuang
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10) : 2152 - 2163
  • [3] Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    McClure, Graham R.
    Belley-Cote, Emilie P.
    Singal, Rohit K.
    Jaffer, Iqbal
    Dvirnik, Nazari
    An, Kevin R.
    Fortin, Gabriel
    Spence, Jessica
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    CIRCULATION, 2016, 134
  • [4] Catheter vs thoracoscopic ablation for atrial fibrillation: Meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Wang, Tom Kai Ming
    Liao, Yi-Wen
    Wang, Michael Tzu Min
    Martin, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2020, 36 (04) : 789 - 793
  • [5] Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tse, G.
    Li, C. K. H.
    Gong, M.
    Lakhani, I.
    Bazoukis, G.
    Letsas, K. P.
    Wu, W. K. K.
    Wong, S. H.
    Li, G.
    Wong, M. C. S.
    Xia, Y.
    Liu, T.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 1016 - 1016
  • [6] Comparison of catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Huang, Haobin
    Wang, Qinxue
    Xu, Jin
    Wu, Yanhu
    Xu, Cheng
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 163 (03): : 980 - 993
  • [7] Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Asad, Zain Ul Abideen
    Yousif, Ali
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Al-Khatib, Sana M.
    Stavrakis, Stavros
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 12 (09):
  • [8] Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Patients with Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Tuohy, S.
    Moran, D.
    O'Donnell, M.
    Galvin, J.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 183 : S400 - S400
  • [9] Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Turagam, Mohit K.
    Garg, Jalaj
    Whang, William
    Sartori, Samantha
    Koruth, Jacob S.
    Miller, Marc A.
    Langan, Noelle
    Sofi, Aamir
    Gomes, Anthony
    Choudry, Subbarao
    Dukkipati, Srinivas R.
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 170 (01) : 41 - +
  • [10] Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    McClure, Graham R.
    Belley-Cote, Emilie P.
    Singal, Rohit K.
    Jaffer, Iqbal H.
    Dvirnik, Nazari
    An, Kevin R.
    Fortin, Gabriel
    Spence, Jessica
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11):