The Research of Flatfielding Correction Method for Spatial Heterodyne Spectrometer at Systematic Level

被引:4
|
作者
Shi Hai-liang [1 ,2 ]
Li Zhi-wei [1 ,2 ]
Luo Hai-yang [1 ,2 ]
Xiong Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Optic Calibrat & Characterizat, Hefei 230031, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Anhui Inst Optic & Fine Mech, Hefei 230031, Peoples R China
关键词
Spatial heterodyne; Flatfielding; Registration accuracy; Spectral deviation; SPECTROSCOPY;
D O I
10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)03-0933-06
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
It can't satisfy the requirement of correction for response non-uniformity at systematic levelif only if the array detector for spatial heterodyne spectrometer is corrected. Traditional methods, such as irradiation with uniform source and column-flat fielding, are not suitable for spatial heterodyne spectrometer. The article expounds convection arm-blocking method for spatial heterodyne spectrometer briefly at first. This method leads to kinds of mismatches including pixel and sub-pixel level shift and rotation in a single arm data after gluing gratings. The effect of registration accuracy of flatfielding coefficients has been analyzed for the experimental breadboard. The result shows that the registration accuracy of flatfielding coefficients needs to be better than 0.1 pixel for the breadboard. The shift at pixel level is calculated by solving the rotational degree by using logarithm-polar coordinate and phase correlation method for the requirement of registration. The shift at sub-pixel level is estimated with DFT based on matrix multiplication. The flow path of flatfielding method at systematic level is concluded. The integral condition of interferometer after actual gluing is modulated by adjusting the positions of gratings slightly. The flatfielding flow path is applied to the data acquired from the modulated interferometer after gluing. Then, the result is compared with the spectrum after the correction with totally matched signal arm data. The final result shows that the spectral deviation is 0.6% between the two spectra compared with the spectral deviation of 4.1% without correction. The accuracy of recovered spectrum after correction has been improved markedly. This can be the foundation for the follow data processing.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 938
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Flatfielding in spatial heterodyne spectroscopy
    Englert, Christoph R.
    Harlander, John M.
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2006, 45 (19) : 4583 - 4590
  • [2] Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms
    Guizar-Sicairos, Manuel
    Thurman, Samuel T.
    Fienup, James R.
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 2008, 33 (02) : 156 - 158
  • [3] HARLANDER J, 1994, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2280, P310, DOI 10.1117/12.186821
  • [4] HARLANDER J, 1990, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1235, P622, DOI 10.1117/12.19125
  • [5] Robust monolithic ultraviolet interferometer for the SHIMMER instrument on STPSat-1
    Harlander, JM
    Roesler, FL
    Englert, CR
    Cardon, JG
    Conway, RR
    Brown, CM
    Wimperis, J
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2003, 42 (15) : 2829 - 2834
  • [6] Li Z., 2014, ACTA OPT SIN, V34
  • [7] Study on the Spectral Characteristics of the Narrow-Band Filter in SHS
    Luo Hai-yan
    Shi Hai-liang
    Li Zhi-wei
    Li Shuang
    Xiong Wei
    Hong Jin
    [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 35 (04) : 1116 - 1119
  • [8] Preflight Radiometric Calibration of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory
    O'Dell, Christopher W.
    Day, Jason O.
    Pollock, Randy
    Bruegge, Carol J.
    O'Brien, Denis M.
    Castano, Rebecca
    Tkatcheva, Irina
    Miller, Charles E.
    Crisp, David
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 49 (06): : 2438 - 2447
  • [9] Spatial heterodyne spectroscopy for atmospheric remote sensing
    Roesler, FL
    Harlander, J
    [J]. OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES AND INSTRUMENTATION FOR ATMOSPHERIC AND SPACE RESEARCH III, 1999, 3756 : 337 - 345
  • [10] Development of the spatial heterodyne spectrometer for VUV remote sensing of the interstellar medium
    Watchorn, S
    Roesler, FL
    Harlander, J
    Jaehnig, KP
    Reynolds, RJ
    Sanders, WT
    [J]. UV/EUV AND VISIBLE SPACE INSTRUMENTATION FOR ASTRONOMY AND SOLAR PHYSICS, 2001, 4498 : 284 - 295