Houston, we have a problem! Understanding the tensions between quality and safety in construction

被引:22
|
作者
Love, Peter E. D. [1 ]
Smith, Jim [2 ]
Ackermann, Fran [3 ]
Irani, Zahir [4 ]
Fang, Weili [5 ]
Luo, Hanbin [5 ]
Ding, Lieyun [5 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Civil & Mech Engn, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Bond Univ, Sch Sustainable Dev, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Sch Management, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Bradford, Fac Management Law & Social Sci, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Mech, Inst Construct Management, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Errors; construction; psychological safety; unsafe behaviour; quality; safety; ERROR MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; REWORK; PERFORMANCE; CLIMATE; PERSONALITY; PROJECTS; SELF;
D O I
10.1080/09537287.2019.1617908
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, we address the following research question: How can psychological safety be used to address the tensions that reside with quality and safety in projects and simultaneously lessen the manifestation of errors? To address this question, we use a vignette to examine the actions before, during and after a major quality event that resulted in serious safety incidents occurring. We demonstrate that unsafe behaviours materializing in projects often stem from multifaceted actions that can be usually traced back to errors (and violations) where rework was required. We show that the transition from error prevention to error management culture can seamlessly transpire with subtle changes to practice. We conclude by suggesting that there is a need to further examine how error management and psychological safety can be enacted to simultaneously improve both quality and safety outcomes in projects.
引用
收藏
页码:1354 / 1365
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条