Psychometric properties of the Irish Management Standards Indicator Tool

被引:9
|
作者
Boyd, S. [1 ]
Kerr, R. [2 ]
Murray, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Council Homeless Northern Ireland CHNI, 4th Floor,Andras House,60 Great Victoria St, Belfast BT2 7BB, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Univ Ulster, Ulster Business Sch, Dept Management & Leadership, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Hlth & Safety Author, Dublin D01 K0Y8, Ireland
来源
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD | 2016年 / 66卷 / 09期
关键词
Factor analysis; indicator tool; management standards; psychometrics; psychosocial hazards; risk assessment; WORK-RELATED STRESSORS; UK; DEPRESSION; VALIDITY; ORGANIZATIONS; VERSION; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1093/occmed/kqw163
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Work Positive is Ireland's national policy initiative to control work-related stress. Since the introduction of the UK Health and Safety Executive's Management Standards (MS) in 2004, a number of studies have been undertaken to assess the potential adaptation of the MS framework within Ireland. Aims To investigate the dimensionality, reliability and validity of the Irish version of the MS Indicator Tool (ROI-MSIT). Methods Between February 2011 and June 2014, we collected data from a wide range of public and private sector organizations that used the ROI-MSIT. In addition to the ROI-MSIT, respondents completed the WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to determine whether the ROI-MSIT maintained the structure of the UK instrument. The internal consistency of the ROI-MSIT was also assessed to determine its reliability, while its criterion-related validity was explored through correlation analysis with the WHO-5. Results Data were collected from 7377 participants. The factor structure of the ROI-MSIT consisted of six factors; the Demands, Control, Peer Support, Relationships and Role factors were equivalent to the original UK factors. Like the Italian version, a principal factor emerged that combined the Manager Support and Change domains. Cronbach's alpha scores ranged from 0.75 to 0.91. Finally, the ROI-MSIT's subscales and WHO-5 were positively correlated (r = 0.42-0.59, P < 0.001). Conclusions The ROI-MSIT is reliable and valid, with a factor structure similar to the original UK instrument and the Italian MSIT. Further psychometric evaluation of the ROI-MSIT is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 724
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric analysis of the German version of the management standards indicator tool (MSIT-D)
    Uglanova, Ekaterina
    Cousins, Rosanna
    Dettmers, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2024, 17 (01) : 21 - 37
  • [2] Investigating the psychometric properties and assessment capabilities of the short version of the Health and Safety Executive's Management Standards Indicator Tool
    Cassar, Vincent
    Bezzina, Frank
    Buttigieg, Sandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 31 (16): : 2115 - 2140
  • [3] The Management Standards Indicator Tool and evaluation of burnout
    Ravalier, J. M.
    McVicar, A.
    Munn-Giddings, C.
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2013, 63 (02): : 145 - 147
  • [4] The Management Standards Indicator Tool and the estimation of risk
    Bevan, A.
    Houdmont, J.
    Menear, N.
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2010, 60 (07): : 525 - 531
  • [5] Psychometric Properties of a 36-Item Version of the "Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool"
    Toderi, Stefano
    Sarchielli, Guido
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (11)
  • [6] Psychometric analysis of the UK health and Safety Executive's Management Standards work-related stress Indicator Tool
    Edwards, Julian A.
    Webster, Simon
    Van Laar, Darren
    Easton, Simon
    WORK AND STRESS, 2008, 22 (02): : 96 - 107
  • [7] Psychometric properties of the HSE Indicator Tool: evidence from Argentina
    Vaamonde, J. D.
    Giacobino, A.
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2023, 73 (02): : 73 - 79
  • [8] The HSE Management Standards Indicator Tool: concurrent and construct validity
    Marcatto, F.
    Colautti, L.
    Filon, F. Larese
    Luis, O.
    Ferrante, D.
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2014, 64 (05): : 365 - 371
  • [9] Psychometric analysis of the Short-Form Chinese Health and Safety Executive's Management Standards Indicator Tool among nurses in Taiwan
    Kao, Chia-Chan
    Wang, Ruey-Hsia
    Ying, Jeremy C.
    Lin, Yu-Hua
    Chang, Feng-Yi
    Chen, Kuei-Ying
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 20 (12) : 1497 - 1508
  • [10] HSE management standards indicator tool and positive work-related outcomes
    Toderi, Stefano
    Balducci, Cristian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2015, 8 (02) : 92 - 108