Evaluation of two aneuploidy screening tests for chorionic villus samples: Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization

被引:3
|
作者
Wu, Tonghua [1 ]
Zhu, Yuanchang [1 ]
Hong, Ling [1 ]
Lin, Qi [1 ]
Chen, Chunmei [1 ]
Yang, Jing [1 ]
Ye, Lijun [1 ]
Huang, Wensi [1 ]
Zeng, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Zhongshan Urol Hosp, Fertil Ctr, Shenzhen Zhongshan Inst Reprod & Genet, Shenzhen Key Lab Reprod Immunol Preimplantat, Shenzhen 518045, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe; amplification (MLPA); Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Fetal chromosomal abnormality; Mosaicism; Pregnancy loss; PREGNANCY LOSS; CHROMOSOMAL-ABNORMALITIES; MISCARRIAGES; CONCEPTION; PRODUCTS; CYTOGENETICS; DIAGNOSIS; GENETICS; MLPA;
D O I
10.1016/j.mcp.2019.101422
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The vast majority of first-trimester pregnancy losses are the consequence of numerical aberrations in fetal chromosomes, which may involve nearly all chromosomes. Although commercial probes for all chromosomes are available for multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses, their use has rarely been reported for screening all 24 chromosomes for early fetal demise, especially by FISH. Here, we validated the ability of MLPA and FISH techniques as two low-cost aneuploidy screening methods for 24 chromosomes in 165 chorionic villus samples (CVSs). The results obtained by two methods were compared by the Chi-square test and the Kappa agreement test. Both methods gave conclusive results for all CVSs tested and showed highly consistent results (kappa = 0.890, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the aneuploidy rate of the CVSs tested by the two methods (p = 0.180). Most of the samples showed fully concordant molecular karyotyping results (81.21%) between the two analytical methods, 10.91% had incompletely concordant results, and 7.88% had discordant results. The inconsistencies included segmental abnormalities, mosaicism, and polyploidy. Both assays used to screen 24 chromosomes were powerful techniques for detecting aneuploidy in CVSs. In terms of cost-effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy, the combination of subtelomeric (P036, P070) and centromeric (P181) MLPA assays is the better analytic strategy and follow-up analysis by FISH is recommended for MLPA-negative samples.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of Chromosome Aneuploidies in Chorionic Villus Samples by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification
    Kooper, Angelique J. A.
    Faas, Brigitte H. W.
    Feuth, Ton
    Creemers, Johan W. T.
    Zondervan, Hans H.
    Boekkooi, Peter F.
    Quartero, Rik W. P.
    Rijnders, Robbert J. P.
    van der Burgt, Ineke
    van Kessel, Ad Geurts
    Smits, Arie P. T.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2009, 11 (01): : 17 - 24
  • [2] Automatic aneuploidy screening based on multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
    Lundsteen, C
    Lind, AM
    Larsen, GV
    Kirchhoff, M
    Duno, M
    Schwartz, M
    Gerdes, T
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2003, 40 : S18 - S18
  • [3] Amplicons in breast cancers analyzed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Ooi, Akishi
    Inokuchi, Masafumi
    Horike, Shin-ichi
    Kawashima, Hiroko
    Ishikawa, Satoko
    Ikeda, Hiroko
    Nakamura, Ritsuko
    Oyama, Takeru
    Dobashi, Yoh
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 85 : 33 - 43
  • [4] Gene Amplification Detection by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification in Comparison with in Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry
    Tabarestani, S.
    Ghaderian, S.
    Rezvani, H.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2014, 16 (06): : 746 - 746
  • [5] Comparing two diagnostic laboratory tests for Williams syndrome:: Fluorescent in situ hybridization versus multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
    Van Hagen, Johanna M.
    Eussen, Hubertus J. F. M. M.
    Van Schooten, Ron
    Van der Geest, Josef N.
    Haselen, Gerardina C. Lagers-Van
    Wouters, Cokkie H.
    De Zeeuw, Chris I.
    Gille, Johan J. P.
    GENETIC TESTING, 2007, 11 (03): : 321 - 327
  • [6] STUDY OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES BY MULTIPLEX LIGATION-DEPENDENT PROBE AMPLIFICATION: CORRELATIONS WITH FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION
    Carbone, F.
    Nozza, F.
    Vona, G.
    Mannarella, C.
    Dell'Acqua, A.
    Scarciolla, O.
    Ciancio, A.
    Daraia, B.
    Bitetti, C.
    Pietrantuono, G.
    Nuccorini, R.
    Pascale, S.
    Pizzuti, M.
    Musto, P.
    Fragasso, A.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2019, 104 : 118 - 119
  • [7] Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) screening in meningioma
    Martinez-Glez, Victor
    Franco-Hernandez, Carmen
    Lomas, Jesus
    Pena-Granero, Carolina
    de Campos, Jose M.
    Isla, Alberto
    Rey, Juan A.
    CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 2007, 173 (02) : 170 - 172
  • [8] Evaluation of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Genetic Analysis of Chorionic Villus Sampling from Pregnancy Loss in Comparison to Karyotyping and Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification
    Deshpande, Maitreyee
    Harper, Joyce
    Holloway, Melissa
    Palmer, Rodger
    Wang, Rubin
    GENETIC TESTING AND MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS, 2010, 14 (03) : 421 - 424
  • [9] Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization are complementary techniques to detect cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma
    Alpar, Donat
    de Jong, Danielle
    Holczer-Nagy, Zsofia
    Kajtar, Bela
    Savola, Suvi
    Jakso, Pal
    David, Marianna
    Kosztolanyi, Szabolcs
    Kereskai, Laszlo
    Pajor, Laszlo
    Szuhai, Karoly
    GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 2013, 52 (09): : 785 - 793
  • [10] Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization for detecting chromosome abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndromes A retrospective study
    Ai, Xiaofei
    Li, Bing
    Xu, Zefeng
    Liu, Jinqin
    Qin, Tiejun
    Li, Qinghua
    Xiao, Zhijian
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (18) : E25768