The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution

被引:215
作者
Greene, Lesley H.
Lewis, Tony E.
Addou, Sarah
Cuff, Alison
Dallman, Tim
Dibley, Mark
Redfern, Oliver
Pearl, Frances
Nambudiry, Rekha
Reid, Adam
Sillitoe, Ian
Yeats, Corin
Thornton, Janet M.
Orengo, Christine A.
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] European Bioinformat Inst, Cambridge CB10 1RQ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/nar/gkl959
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We report the latest release (version 3.0) of the CATH protein domain database (http://www.cathdb.info). There has been a 20% increase in the number of structural domains classified in CATH, up to 86 151 domains. Release 3.0 comprises 1110 fold groups and 2147 homologous superfamilies. To cope with the increases in diverse structural homologues being determined by the structural genomics initiatives, more sensitive methods have been developed for identifying boundaries in multi-domain proteins and for recognising homologues. The CATH classification update is now being driven by an integrated pipeline that links these automated procedures with validation steps, that have been made easier by the provision of information rich web pages summarising comparison scores and relevant links to external sites for each domain being classified. An analysis of the population of domains in the CATH hierarchy and several domain characteristics are presented for version 3.0. We also report an update of the CATH Dictionary of homologous structures (CATH-DHS) which now contains multiple structural alignments, consensus information and functional annotations for 1459 well populated superfamilies in CATH. CATH is directly linked to the Gene3D database which is a projection of CATH structural data onto similar to 2 million sequences in completed genomes and UniProt.
引用
收藏
页码:D291 / D297
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   BASIC LOCAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL [J].
ALTSCHUL, SF ;
GISH, W ;
MILLER, W ;
MYERS, EW ;
LIPMAN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 215 (03) :403-410
[2]   The universal protein resource (UniProt) [J].
Bairoch, A ;
Apweiler, R ;
Wu, CH ;
Barker, WC ;
Boeckmann, B ;
Ferro, S ;
Gasteiger, E ;
Huang, HZ ;
Lopez, R ;
Magrane, M ;
Martin, MJ ;
Natale, DA ;
O'Donovan, C ;
Redaschi, N ;
Yeh, LSL .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 :D154-D159
[3]   The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000 [J].
Bairoch, A ;
Apweiler, R .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :45-48
[4]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[5]   The CATH Dictionary of Homologous Superfamilies (DHS): a consensus approach for identifying distant structural homologues [J].
Bray, JE ;
Todd, AE ;
Pearl, FMG ;
Thornton, JM ;
Orengo, CA .
PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 2000, 13 (03) :153-165
[6]   The impact of structural genomics: Expectations and outcomes [J].
Chandonia, JM ;
Brenner, SE .
SCIENCE, 2006, 311 (5759) :347-351
[7]   PARSER FOR PROTEIN-FOLDING UNITS [J].
HOLM, L ;
SANDER, C .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 1994, 19 (03) :256-268
[8]   KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes [J].
Kanehisa, M ;
Goto, S .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :27-30
[9]   Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies [J].
Karplus, K ;
Barrett, C ;
Hughey, R .
BIOINFORMATICS, 1998, 14 (10) :846-856
[10]  
LORD PW, 2003, PAC S BIOC