Economic consequences of consideration of permanence, leakage and additionality for soil carbon sequestration projects

被引:79
|
作者
Murray, Brian C. [1 ]
Sohngen, Brent
Ross, Martin T.
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Nicholas Inst Environm Policy Solut, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] RTI Int, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Soils;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-006-9169-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper introduces, explains, and describes methods for addressing the issues of permanence, leakage, and additionality (PLA) of agricultural soil carbon sequestration (ASCS) activities at the project level. It is important to cast these as project-level issues, because they relate to the integrity and consistency of using location-specific ASCS projects as an offset against GHG emissions generated in other sectors (e.g., energy). The underlying objective is to understand and quantify what the net carbon benefits of an ASCS project are once we account for the fact that (1) the sequestered carbon may be stored impermanently, (2) the project may displace emissions outside the project boundaries (leakage), and (3) the project's carbon sequestration may not be entirely additional to what would have occurred anyway under business-as-usual (no project) conditions. This article evaluates methods for identifying and estimating PLA and gauges the potential magnitude of these effects on the economic returns to a project.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 143
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Economic consequences of consideration of permanence, leakage and additionality for soil carbon sequestration projects
    Brian C. Murray
    Brent Sohngen
    Martin T. Ross
    Climatic Change, 2007, 80 : 127 - 143
  • [2] Challenges in developing effective policy for soil carbon sequestration: perspectives on additionality, leakage, and permanence
    Thamo, Tas
    Pannell, David J.
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2016, 16 (08) : 973 - 992
  • [3] Dynamic Stability of Soil Carbon: Reassessing the "Permanence" of Soil Carbon Sequestration
    Dynarski, Katherine A.
    Bossio, Deborah A.
    Scow, Kate M.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8
  • [4] Set-asides for carbon sequestration: implications for permanence and leakage
    Sun, Bin
    Sohngen, Brent
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 96 (03) : 409 - 419
  • [5] Set-asides for carbon sequestration: implications for permanence and leakage
    Bin Sun
    Brent Sohngen
    Climatic Change, 2009, 96 : 409 - 419
  • [6] Carbon sequestration in soil with consideration of CO2 emissions from production inputs:: An economic analysis
    Williams, Jeffery R.
    Nelson, Richard G.
    Claassen, Mark M.
    Rice, Charles W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, 33 (Suppl 1) : S264 - S273
  • [7] Carbon Sequestration in Soil with Consideration of CO2 Emissions from Production Inputs: An Economic Analysis
    Jeffery R. Williams
    Richard G. Nelson
    Mark M. Claassen
    Charles W. Rice
    Environmental Management, 2004, 33 : S264 - S273
  • [8] The consequences of failure should be considered in siting geologic carbon sequestration projects
    Price, Phillip N.
    Oldenburg, Curtis M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2009, 3 (05) : 658 - 663
  • [9] Monitoring and economic factors affecting the economic viability of afforestation for carbon sequestration projects
    Robertson, K
    Loza-Balbuena, I
    Ford-Robertson, J
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2004, 7 (06) : 465 - 475
  • [10] Physical carbon-sequestration mechanisms under special consideration of soil wettability
    Bachmann, Jorg
    Guggenberger, Georg
    Baumgartl, Thomas
    Ellerbrock, Ruth H.
    Urbanek, Emilia
    Goebel, Marc-O.
    Kaiser, Klaus
    Horn, Rainer
    Fischer, Walter R.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2008, 171 (01) : 14 - 26