Fertility of fresh and frozen sex-sorted semen in dairy cows and heifers in seasonal-calving pasture-based herds

被引:21
|
作者
Maicas, C. [1 ,2 ]
Hutchinson, I. A. [1 ]
Kenneally, J. [1 ]
Grant, J. [3 ]
Cromie, A. R. [4 ]
Lonergan, P. [2 ]
Butler, S. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Fermoy P61 P302, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Dublin D04 N2E5 4, Ireland
[3] TEAGASC, Res Operat Grp, Dublin D15 DY05 15, Ireland
[4] Irish Cattle Breeding Federat, Highfield House, Bandon P72 X050, Cork, Ireland
关键词
sexed semen; pasture-based system; dairy; fertility; CONVENTIONAL SEMEN; CONCEPTION RATES; MILK-PRODUCTION; SPERM DOSAGE; FIELD DATA; HOLSTEIN; INSEMINATION; REPRODUCTION; ASSOCIATIONS; SPERMATOZOA;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2019-16740
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Our objective in this study was to evaluate the reproductive performance of dairy heifers and cows inseminated with fresh or frozen sex-sorted semen (SS) in seasonal-calving pasture-based dairy herds. Ejaculates of 10 Holstein-Friesian bulls were split and processed to provide (1) fresh conventional semen at 3 x 10(6) sperm per straw (CONV); (2) fresh SS at 1 x 10(6) sperm per straw (SS-1M); (3) fresh SS semen at 2 x 10(6) sperm per straw (SS-2M); and (4) frozen SS at 2 x 10(6) sperm per straw (SS-FRZ). Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effect of semen treatment and other explanatory variables on pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) in heifers (n = 3,214) and lactating cows (n = 5,457). In heifers, P/AI was greater for inseminations with CONV (60.9%) than with SS-FRZ (52.8%) but did not differ from SS-1M (54.2%) or SS-2M (53.5%). Cows inseminated with CONV had greater P/AI (48.0%) than cows inseminated with SS, irrespective of treatment (SS-1M, SS-2M, and S-FROZEN; 37.6, 38.9, and 40.6%, respectively). None of the SS treatments differed from each other with regard to P/AI in either heifers or cows. The relative performance of SS compared with CONV was also examined [i.e., relative P/AI = (SS P/AI)/(CONV P/AI) x 100]. Frozen SS achieved relative P/AI >84%. Bull affected P/AI in both heifers and cows, but no bull by semen treatment interaction was observed. In heifers, P/AI increased with increasing predicted transmitting ability for milk protein percentage. In cows, P/AI increased with increasing Economic Breeding Index (EBI) and with days in milk (DIM) at AI but decreased with increasing EBI milk subindex, parity and with DIM2. Cows in parity >= 5 had the lowest P/AI and differed from cows in parities 1, 2, or 3. Dispatch-to-AI interval of fresh semen did not affect P/AI in lactating cows, but a dispatch-to-AI interval by bull interaction was detected whereby P/AI was constant for most bulls but increased with greater dispatch-to-AI intervals for 2 bulls. In conclusion, frozen SS achieved greater P/AI relative to conventional semen than was previously reported in lactating cows. Fresh SS did not achieve greater P/AI than frozen SS, regardless of whether the sperm dose per straw was 1 x 10 6 or 2 x10(6). A bull effect for all semen treatments, as well as a dispatch-to-AI interval by bull interaction for fresh semen, highlights the importance of using a large team of bulls for breeding management.
引用
收藏
页码:10530 / 10542
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fertility of fresh and frozen sex-sorted semen in dairy cows and heifers in seasonal-calving pasture-based herds.
    Maicas, C.
    Hutchinson, I.
    Kenneally, J.
    Grant, J.
    Cromie, A.
    Moreno, J.
    Vishwanath, R.
    Maia, E.
    Lonergan, P.
    Butler, S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 : 115 - 116
  • [2] Fertility of frozen sex-sorted semen at 4 x 106 sperm per dose in lactating dairy cows in seasonal-calving pasture-based herds.
    Maicas, C.
    Holden, S.
    Drake, E.
    Cromie, A.
    Lonergan, P.
    Butler, S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 : 116 - 116
  • [3] Fertility of frozen sex-sorted sperm at 4 x 106 sperm per dose in lactating dairy cows in seasonal-calving pasture-based herds
    Maicas, C.
    Holden, S. A.
    Drake, E.
    Cromie, A. R.
    Lonergan, P.
    Butler, S. T.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (01) : 929 - 939
  • [4] Economic impact of different strategies to use sex-sorted sperm for reproductive management in seasonal-calving, pasture-based dairy herds
    Ruelle, E.
    Shalloo, L.
    Butler, S. T.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (11) : 11747 - 11758
  • [5] Does timing of AI affect P/AI in seasonal-calving, pasture-based lactating dairy cows inseminated with sex-sorted sperm?
    Drake, E.
    Holden, S. A.
    Cromie, A. R.
    Randi, F.
    Lonergan, P.
    Butler, S. T.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 : 106 - 106
  • [6] Effect of delayed timing of artificial insemination with sex-sorted semen on pregnancy per artificial insemination in synchronized dairy heifers managed in a seasonal-calving pasture-based system
    Moore, S. G.
    Crowe, A. D.
    Randi, F.
    Butler, S. T.
    JDS COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 4 (05): : 417 - 421
  • [7] Evaluation of delayed timing of artificial insemination with sex-sorted sperm on pregnancy per artificial insemination in seasonal-calving, pasture-based lactating dairy cows
    Drake, E.
    Holden, S. A.
    Aublet, V.
    Doyle, R. C.
    Millar, C.
    Moore, S. G.
    Maicas, C.
    Randi, F.
    Cromie, A. R.
    Lonergan, P.
    Butler, S. T.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (12) : 12059 - 12068
  • [8] The influence of sexed semen use and genotyping on genetic gain in seasonal-calving pasture-based dairy herds
    Murphy, Craig
    Shalloo, Laurence
    Butler, Stephen T.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 169 : 129 - 129
  • [9] Genetic parameters for animal mortality in pasture-based, seasonal-calving dairy and beef herds
    Ring, S. C.
    Evans, R. D.
    Doherty, M. L.
    Berry, D. P.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2019, 219 : 10 - 16
  • [10] Non-return rate as a predictor of calving rate in seasonal-calving pasture-based dairy herds
    Fair, S.
    Lonergan, P.
    Butler, S. T.
    Murphy, C.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 169 : 133 - 133