Comparative effectiveness analysis of first-line immunotherapy versus chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

被引:2
|
作者
Chakiryan, Nicholas H. [1 ]
Jiang, Da David [2 ]
Gillis, Kyle A. [3 ]
Green, Elizabeth [1 ]
Hajiran, Ali [1 ]
Hugar, Lee [1 ]
Zemp, Logan [1 ]
Zhang, Jingsong [1 ]
Jain, Rohit [1 ]
Chahoud, Jad [1 ]
Li, Roger [1 ]
Sexton, Wade [1 ]
Manley, Brandon J. [1 ]
Gilbert, Scott M. [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Genitourinary Oncol, Tampa, FL 33682 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Urol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Metastatic urothelial carcinoma; Immunotherapy; Chemotherapy; RADICAL CYSTECTOMY; CANCER; MULTICENTER; PEMBROLIZUMAB; ATEZOLIZUMAB; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.07.030
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Clinical trials have not shown a significant overall survival (OS) difference between chemotherapy and immunotherapy as first-line agents in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the generalizability of these findings in a real-world setting has not yet been evaluated in comparative effectiveness studies. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy compared with chemotherapy regimens on OS in patients with metastatic UC of the bladder. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective propensity-matched study identified metastatic bladder UC patients in the National Cancer Database from 2014 to 2017 who received either first-line immunotherapy-monotherapy or multi-agent chemotherapy, and who were not treated on a clinical trial protocol. Outcome Measures and Analysis: The primary outcome was OS from the date of diagnosis to date of death or censoring at last followup. Patients were stratified into first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy treatment groups. After 1:1 nearest-neighbor caliper-matching of propensity scores, the survival analysis was conducted using Cox regression modeling and Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results and Limitations: A total of 2,796 patients were included in the final study population, and 960 in the matched cohort (480 per treatment group). Utilization of immunotherapy increased over the time period studied as chemotherapy decreased (Immunotherapy: 3% -37%; Chemotherapy: 97%-63%; P < 0.001). In the overall cohort, patients who received first-line immunotherapy were older and more comorbid than those who received first-line chemotherapy (Age: 73 v. 67, respectively, P < 0.001; Charlson-Deyo score >= 2: 17% v. 11.5%, respectively, P < 0.001). In the matched cohort, patients who were treated with first-line immunotherapy had similar OS to those who were treated with first-line chemotherapy (HR: 0.91, 95CI 0.72-1.15). Due to the retrospective nature of the study, interpretation is limited by potential selection bias from unmeasured confounding. Conclusions and Relevance: Metastatic bladder UC patients who received first-line immunotherapy had similar OS to those who received first-line chemotherapy. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:107.e11 / 107.e17
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] First-line Immunotherapy in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    Ghatalia, Pooja
    Zibelman, Matthew
    Geynisman, Daniel M.
    Plimack, Elizabeth R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (01): : 45 - 47
  • [2] Chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A large real-world experience
    Ranganathan, Sanjana
    Riveros, Carlos
    Xu, Jiaqiong
    Hu, Siqi
    Geng, Michael
    Huang, Emily
    Melchiode, Zachary
    Zhang, Jun
    Efstathiou, Eleni
    Chan, Keith Syson
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Sonpavde, Guru
    Satkunasivam, Raj
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (09) : 291e13 - 291e25
  • [3] Chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A large real-world experience.
    Ranganathan, Sanjana
    Riveros, Carlos
    Xu, Jiaqiong
    Geng, Michael
    Huang, Emily
    Anis, Maryam
    Muhammad, Taliah
    Zhang, Jun
    Efstathiou, Eleni
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Sonpavde, Guru P.
    Satkunasivam, Raj
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41
  • [4] Reevaluating immunotherapy's potential in first-line metastatic urothelial carcinoma
    Castano-Amores, Celia
    Nieto-Gomez, Pelayo
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2024,
  • [5] Beyond first-line systemic treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
    E. El Rassy
    T. Assi
    Z. Bakouny
    N. Pavlidis
    J. Kattan
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2019, 21 : 280 - 288
  • [6] Beyond first-line systemic treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
    El Rassy, E.
    Assi, T.
    Bakouny, Z.
    Pavlidis, N.
    Kattan, J.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 21 (03): : 280 - 288
  • [7] Treatment Options for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After First-Line Chemotherapy
    Tassinari, Elisa
    Mollica, Veronica
    Nuvola, Giacomo
    Marchetti, Andrea
    Rosellini, Matteo
    Massari, Francesco
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2022, 14 : 1945 - 1960
  • [8] Tailored Selection of First-Line Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma of Bladder
    Hsieh, Meng-Che
    Huang, Cheng-Hua
    Chiang, Po-Hui
    Chen, Yen-Yang
    Tang, Yeh
    Su, Yu-Li
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 7 (10): : 1347 - 1352
  • [9] Atezolizumab with chemotherapy in first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Zhang, Peng-Fei
    Wen, Feng
    Wu, Qiu-Ji
    Li, Qiu
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (14) : 1021 - 1030
  • [10] CROSS-REACTIVITY BETWEEN THE FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY AND SUBSEQUENT IMMUNOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA
    Hamaya, Tomoko
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Ozaki, Kai
    Okita, Kazutaka
    Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
    Ohyama, Chikara
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E1017 - E1017