PROTOCOL: Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: An assessment of current methods

被引:4
|
作者
Young, Sarah [1 ]
Bethel, Alison [2 ]
Keenan, Ciara [3 ]
Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate [4 ]
Moreton, Elizabeth [5 ]
Pickup, David [6 ]
Premji, Zahra A. [7 ]
Rogers, Morwenna [8 ]
Viinholt, Bjorn C. A. [9 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Univ Lib, 4909 Frew St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula PenCLAHRC, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Queens Univ, Ctr Evidence & Social Innovat, Campbell UK & Ireland, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Cornell Univ, Albert R Mann Lib, Ithaca, NY USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[6] Concordia Univ, Ctr Study Learning & Performance, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Lib & Cultural Resources, Calgary, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, Inst Hlth Res, NIHR PenCLAHRC, Exeter, Devon, England
[9] VIVE Danish Ctr Social Sci Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
JOURNALS;
D O I
10.1002/cl2.1208
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This is the protocol for a Campbell review. The aim of this study is to comprehensively assess the quality and nature of the search methods and reporting across Campbell systematic reviews. The search methods used in systematic reviews provide the foundation for establishing the body of literature from which conclusions are drawn and recommendations made. Searches should be comprehensive and reporting of search methods should be transparent and reproducible. Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews strive to adhere to the best methodological guidance available for this type of searching. The current work aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of the search methods and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews. Our specific objectives include the following: To examine how searches are currently conducted in Campbell systematic reviews. To identify any machine learning or automation methods used, or emerging and less commonly used approaches to web searching. To examine how search strategies, search methods and search reporting adhere to the Methodological Expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) and PRISMA guidelines. The findings will be used to identify opportunities for advancing current practices in Campbell reviews through updated guidance, peer review processes and author training and support.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods
    Young, Sarah
    MacDonald, Heather
    Louden, Diana
    Ellis, Ursula M.
    Premji, Zahra
    Rogers, Morwenna
    Bethel, Alison
    Pickup, David
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 20 (03)
  • [2] PROTOCOL: Assessment of outcome reporting bias in studies included in Campbell systematic reviews
    Littell, Julia H. H.
    Gorman, Dennis M. M.
    Valentine, Jeffrey C. C.
    Pigott, Therese D. D.
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (02)
  • [3] The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
    Wei, Li-li
    Zhang, Jing
    Yang, Ying
    Cao, Hao-Yu
    Yang, Ke-hu
    Si, Li-Juan
    Tian, Jin-Hui
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [4] The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
    Li-li Wei
    Jing Zhang
    Ying Yang
    Hao-Yu Cao
    Ke-hu Yang
    Li-Juan Si
    Jin-Hui Tian
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17
  • [5] PROTOCOL: The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: a methodological systematic review
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Welch, Vivian
    Yao, Liang
    Littell, Julia H.
    Li, Huijuan
    Li, Meixuan
    Yang, Nan
    Wang, Jianjian
    Shamseer, Larissa
    Chen, Yaolong
    Yang, Kehu
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 15 (1-2)
  • [6] Collaboration with the Campbell Collaboration - EPPI Centre reviews will aim to disseminate systematic reviews in education
    Elbourne, D
    Oakley, A
    Gough, D
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7323): : 1253 - 1253
  • [7] The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Welch, Vivian
    Li, Meixuan
    Yao, Liang
    Littell, Julia
    Li, Huijuan
    Yang, Nan
    Wang, Jianjian
    Shamseer, Larissa
    Chen, Yaolong
    Yang, Kehu
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 17 (01)
  • [8] Introduction to the Special Issue on Campbell Collaboration Systematic Reviews
    Maynard, Brandy R.
    Littell, Julia H.
    Shlonsky, Aron
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2018, 28 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [9] Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews
    MacDonald, Heather
    Comer, Cozette
    Foster, Margaret
    Labelle, Patrick R.
    Marsalis, Scott
    Nyhan, Kate
    Premji, Zahra
    Rogers, Morwenna
    Splenda, Ryan
    Stansfield, Claire
    Young, Sarah
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 20 (03)
  • [10] PROTOCOL: Assessment of publication time in Campbell systematic reviews: A cross-sectional survey
    Pan, Bei
    Ge, Long
    Wei, Zhipeng
    Hou, Liangying
    Lai, Honghao
    Yang, Kehu
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (01)