The use of ecological models to assess the effects of a plant protection product on ecosystem services provided by an orchard

被引:8
|
作者
Van den Brink, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
Alix, Anne [3 ]
Thorbek, Pernille [4 ]
Baveco, Hans [1 ]
Agatz, Annika [5 ]
Faber, Jack H. [1 ]
Brown, A. Ross [6 ]
Marshall, Stuart [7 ]
Maltby, Lorraine [8 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Environm Res, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Aquat Ecol & Water Qual Management Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Corteva Agrisci, 38 Pk Sq,Milton Pk, Abingdon OX14 4RN, Oxon, England
[4] BASF SE, APD EE, Speyerer Str 2, D-67117 Limburgerhof, Germany
[5] Ibacon GmbH, Arheilger Weg 17, D-64380 Rossdorf, Germany
[6] Univ Exeter, Biosci, Geoffrey Pope Bldg,Stocker Rd, Exeter EX4 4QD, Devon, England
[7] 6 Prestwick Rd, Bedford MK40 4FH, England
[8] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Pesticides; Ecosystem services; Risk assessment; Terrestrial environment; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK-ASSESSMENT; LANDSCAPES; PESTICIDES; GOALS; SOIL; POPULATIONS; COLLEMBOLA; COLEOPTERA; ABUNDANCE; TOXICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149329
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this case study was to explore the feasibility of using ecological models for applying an ecosystem services-based approach to environmental risk assessment using currently available data and methodologies. For this we used a 5 step approach: 1) selection of environmental scenario, 2) ecosystem service selection, 3) development of logic chains, 4) selection and application of ecological models and 5) detailed ecosystem service assessment. The study system is a European apple orchard managed according to integrated pest management principles. An organophosphate insecticide was used as the case study chemical. Four ecosystem services are included in this case study: soil quality regulation, pest control, pollination and recreation. Logic chains were developed for each ecosystem service and describe the link between toxicant effects on service providing units and ecosystem services delivery. For the soil quality regulation ecosystem service, springtails and earthworms were the service providing units, for the pest control ecosystem service it was ladybirds, for the pollination ecosystem service it was honeybees and for the recreation ecosystem service it was the meadow brown butterfly. All the ecological models addressed the spatio-temporal magnitude of the direct effects of the insecticide on the service providing units and ecological production functions were used to extrapolate these outcomes to the delivery of ecosystem services. For all ecosystem services a decision on the acceptability of the modelled and extrapolated effects on the service providing units could be made using the protection goals as set by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Developing quantitative ecological production functions for extrapolation of ecosystem services delivery from population endpoints remains one of the major challenges. We feel that the use of ecological models can greatly add to this development, although the further development of existing ecological models, and of new models, is needed for this. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of plant protection products on ecosystem functions provided by terrestrial invertebrates
    Colette Bertrand
    Stéphanie Aviron
    Céline Pelosi
    Juliette Faburé
    Sophie Le Perchec
    Laure Mamy
    Magali Rault
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2025, 32 (6) : 2956 - 2974
  • [2] Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles
    Nichols, E.
    Spector, S.
    Louzada, J.
    Larsen, T.
    Amequita, S.
    Favila, M. E.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (06) : 1461 - 1474
  • [3] Legal protection of ecosystem services provided by Marine Protected Areas in Mexico
    Ortiz-Lozano, Leonardo
    Olivera-Vazquez, Lorena
    Espejel, Ileana
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 138 : 101 - 110
  • [4] An improved indicator framework to assess and optimise ecosystem services provided by permanent grasslands
    Mondiere, A.
    Tzilivakis, J.
    Warner, D. J.
    van der Werf, H. M. G.
    Farruggia, A.
    Glinec, O.
    Corson, M. S.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 146
  • [5] A methodology to assess the effects of plant protection product on the homing flight of honeybee foragers
    Fourrier, Julie
    Petit, Julie
    Fortini, Dominique
    Aupinel, Pierrick
    Morhan, Clemence
    Vidau, Cyril
    Grateau, Stephane
    Henry, Mickael
    Decourtye, Axel
    HAZARDS OF PESTICIDES TO BEES: 12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE ICP-PR BEE PROTECTION GROUP, 2015, 450 : 130 - 130
  • [6] How does ecological protection redline policy affect regional land use and ecosystem services?
    Guo, Xueyan
    Zhang, Yuxin
    Guo, Dongfang
    Lu, Wentao
    Xu, He
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 100
  • [7] Ecosystem services assessment tool for agroforestry (ESAT-A): An approach to assess selected ecosystem services provided by alley cropping systems
    Tsonkova, Penka
    Quinkenstein, Ansgar
    Boehm, Christian
    Freese, Dirk
    Schaller, Eberhard
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 45 : 285 - 299
  • [8] Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services in Arid Area Ecological Migration
    Xiaopeng Liu
    Xiao Chen
    Kaiping Hua
    Yajuan Wang
    Peng Wang
    Xiaojia Han
    Junyan Ye
    Shengqiang Wen
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 : 894 - 906
  • [9] Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services in Arid Area Ecological Migration
    Liu Xiaopeng
    Chen Xiao
    Hua Kaiping
    Wang Yajuan
    Wang Peng
    Han Xiaojia
    Ye Junyan
    Wen Shengqiang
    CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 28 (05) : 894 - 906
  • [10] Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services in Arid Area Ecological Migration
    LIU Xiaopeng
    CHEN Xiao
    HUA Kaiping
    WANG Yajuan
    WANG Peng
    HAN Xiaojia
    YE Junyan
    WEN Shengqiang
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 (05) : 894 - 906