Prenatal Diagnosis Using Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in High-Risk Pregnancies

被引:2
|
作者
Hsiao, Ching-Hua [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Jia-Shing [3 ]
Shiao, Yu-Ming [4 ,5 ]
Chen, Yann-Jang [6 ,7 ]
Chen, Ching-Hsuan [2 ]
Chu, Woei-Chyn [1 ]
Wu, Yi-Cheng [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Taipei City Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Women & Children Campus, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[3] I Shou Univ, Sch Med Int Students, Kaohsiung 840, Taiwan
[4] Chung Yuan Christian Univ, Dept Biosci Technol, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan
[5] Union Clin Lab, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Life Sci, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[7] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Genome Sci, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[8] Ton Yen Gen Hosp, Ultrasound Ctr Taiwan IVF Grp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Zhubei 302, Taiwan
关键词
chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA); copy number variants (CNVs); variants of unknown significance (VOUS); amniotic fluid (AF); chorionic villus sampling (CVS); JOINT CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATION; COPY-NUMBER VARIANTS; MEDICAL GENETICS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; NORMAL KARYOTYPE; STANDARDS; FETUSES; GUIDELINES; GENOMICS; ABNORMALITIES;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11133624
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To assess the value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) during the prenatal diagnosis of high-risk pregnancies. Methods: Between January 2016 and November 2021, we included 178 chorionic villi and 859 amniocentesis samples from consecutive cases at a multiple tertiary hospital. Each of these high-risk singleton pregnancies had at least one of the following indications: (1) advanced maternal age (AMA; >= 35 years; 546, 52.7%); (2) fetal structural abnormality on ultrasound (197, 19.0%); (3) high-risk first- or second-trimester Down syndrome screen (189, 18.2%), including increased nuchal translucency (>= 3.5 mm; 90, 8.7%); or (4) previous pregnancy, child, or family history (105, 10.1%) affected by chromosomal abnormality or genetic disorder. Both G-banding karyotype analysis and CMA were performed. DNA was extracted directly and examined with oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Results: Aneuploidies were detected by both G-banding karyotyping and CMA in 42/1037 (4.05%) cases. Among the 979 cases with normal karyotypes, 110 (10.6%) cases had copy number variants (CNVs) in CMA, including 30 (2.9%) cases with reported pathogenic and likely pathogenic CNVs >= 400 kb, 37 (3.6%) with nonreported VOUS, benign, or likely benign CNVs >= 400 kb, and 43 (4.1%) with nonreported CNVs < 400 kb. Of the 58 (5.6%) cases with aneuploidy rearrangements, 42 (4.1%) were diagnosed by both G-banding karyotyping and CMA; four inversions, six balanced translocations, and six low mosaic rates were not detected with CMA. Conclusions: CMA is an effective first step for the prenatal diagnosis of high-risk pregnancies with fetal structural anomalies found in ultrasonography or upon positive findings.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Findings in Chromosomal Microarray Analysis during Prenatal Diagnosis in High-Risk Individuals
    Salas, Pilar Carrasco
    Escobar, Reyes Granell
    Mira, Ana Serrano
    Saldana, Angustias Perez
    Vidal, Marta Cosculluela
    Garrido, Carlos
    Rico, Ignacio Vazquez
    MOLECULAR SYNDROMOLOGY, 2024,
  • [2] Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies in high risk pregnancies using FISH
    Jobanputra, V
    Kriplani, A
    Rai, KK
    Kucheria, K
    CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1999, 85 (1-2): : 53 - 53
  • [3] Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in women with high risk pregnancies
    Jobanputra, V
    Roy, KK
    Kriplani, A
    Kucheria, K
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 114 : 148 - 155
  • [4] Validation of a Chromosomal Microarray for Prenatal Diagnosis Using a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancies with Increased Risk for Chromosome Abnormalities
    Wright, Dale
    Carey, Louise
    Battersby, Siobhan
    Thuy Nguyen
    Clarke, Melanie
    Nash, Benjamin
    Gulesserian, Elee
    Cross, Jill
    Darmanian, Artur
    GENETIC TESTING AND MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS, 2016, 20 (12) : 791 - 798
  • [5] Chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis
    Xie, Yingjun
    Sun, Xiaofang
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 44 (02): : 177 - 179
  • [6] Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Prenatal Diagnosis
    Lo, Jamie O.
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Feist, Cori D.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2014, 69 (10) : 613 - 621
  • [7] Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis
    Levy, Brynn
    Wapner, Ronald
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (02) : 201 - 212
  • [8] Chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with high-risk prenatal indications: A retrospective study in China
    Luo, Xiaomei
    Zhu, Hong
    Wang, Lili
    Xiao, Bing
    Fan, Yanjie
    Ye, Hui
    Ying, Xiaomin
    Qiu, Wenjuan
    Zhang, Huiwen
    Han, Lianshu
    Gu, Xuefan
    Yu, Yongguo
    Wang, Lei
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 60 (02): : 299 - 304
  • [9] Chromosomal abnormalities detected by chromosomal microarray analysis and pregnancy outcomes of 4211 fetuses with high-risk prenatal indications
    Li, Huafeng
    Hu, Juan
    Wu, Qingyu
    Qiu, Jigang
    Zhang, Li
    Zhu, Jinping
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [10] The Use of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis
    Stosic, Melissa
    Levy, Brynn
    Wapner, Ronald
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 45 (01) : 55 - +