Comparative Analysis of On-Board Methane and Methanol Reforming Systems Combined with HT-PEM Fuel Cell and CO2 Capture/Liquefaction System for Hydrogen Fueled Ship Application

被引:22
|
作者
Lee, Hyunyong [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Inchul [1 ]
Roh, Gilltae [1 ]
Na, Youngseung [3 ]
Kang, Hokeun [2 ]
机构
[1] Korean Register, R&D Div, 36 Myeongji Ocean City 9 Ro, Busan 46762, South Korea
[2] Korea Maritime & Ocean Univ, Div Marine Syst Engn, 727 Taejong Ro, Busan 49112, South Korea
[3] Univ Seoul, Dept Mech & Informat Engn, Seoulsiripdaero 163, Seoul 02504, South Korea
关键词
steam methane reforming; steam methanol reforming; electrical efficiency; exergy efficiency; LNG; COMPARATIVE EXERGY ANALYSIS; STEAM; CAPTURE; POWER; PERFORMANCE; GAS; COMBUSTION; OPTIONS; MEA; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.3390/en13010224
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study performs energetic and exergetic comparisons between the steam methane reforming and steam methanol reforming technologies combined with HT-PEMFC and a carbon capture/liquefaction system for use in hydrogen-fueled ships. The required space for the primary fuel and captured/liquefied CO2 and the fuel cost have also been investigated to find the more advantageous system for ship application. For the comparison, the steam methane reforming-based system fed by LNG and the steam methanol reforming-based system fed by methanol have been modeled in an Aspen HYSYS environment. All the simulations have been conducted at a fixed W-net, (electrical) (475 kW) to meet the average shaft power of the reference ship. Results show that at the base condition, the energy and exergy efficiencies of the methanol-based system are 7.99% and 1.89% higher than those of the methane-based system, respectively. The cogeneration efficiency of the methane-based system is 7.13% higher than that of the methanol-based system. The comparison of space for fuel and CO2 storage reveals that the methanol-based system requires a space 1.1 times larger than that of the methane-based system for the total voyage time, although the methanol-based system has higher electrical efficiency. In addition, the methanol-based system has a fuel cost 2.2 times higher than that of the methane-based system to generate 475 kW net of electricity for the total voyage time.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] ON-BOARD HYDROGEN FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE PEM FUEL CELL STACK BY METHANE AND METHANOL STEAM REFORMING
    Kolavennu, Panini
    Das, Susanta K.
    Berry, K. Joel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUEL CELL SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNOLOGY - 2008, 2008, : 447 - 451
  • [2] Process analysis of a molten carbonate fuel cell on-board application to reduce vessel CO2 emissions
    Bosio, Barbara
    Archetti, Maurizio
    Audasso, Emilio
    Bove, Dario
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2023, 190
  • [3] Design, modelling and techno-economic analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine system with CO2 capture fueled by gases from steel industry
    Rao, M.
    Fernandes, A.
    Pronk, P.
    Aravind, P. V.
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 148 : 1258 - 1270