Temporary investment tax incentives: Theory with evidence from bonus depreciation

被引:188
作者
House, Christopher L. [1 ,2 ]
Shapiro, Matthew D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Econ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1257/aer.98.3.737
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The intertemporal elasticity of investment for long-lived capital goods is nearly infinite. Consequently, investment prices should fully reflect temporary tax subsidies, regardless of the investment supply elasticity. Since prices move one for-one with the subsidy, elasticities can be inferred from quantities alone. This paper uses a recent tax policy-bonus depreciation-to estimate the investment supply elasticity. Investment in qualified capital increased sharply. The estimated elasticity is high-between 6 and 14. There is no evidence that market prices reacted to the subsidy, suggesting that adjustment costs are internal, or that measurement error masks the price changes.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 768
页数:32
相关论文
共 33 条
[2]  
AUERBACH AJ, 1991, CARN ROCH CONF SERIE, V35, P185, DOI 10.1016/0167-2231(91)90024-Y
[3]   TAX POLICY AND BUSINESS FIXED INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
AUERBACH, AJ ;
HASSETT, K .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1992, 47 (02) :141-170
[4]  
AUERBACH AJ, 1987, EFFECTS TAXATION CAP, P163
[5]   How responsive is business capital formation to its user cost? An exploration with micro data [J].
Chirinko, RS ;
Fazzari, SM ;
Meyer, AP .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1999, 74 (01) :53-80
[6]  
Cohen D.S., 2006, FINANCE EC DISCUSSIO
[7]  
CUMMINS JG, 2004, BROOKINGS PAPERS EC, V2, P1
[8]  
DESAI MA, 2004, BROOKINGS PAPERS EC, V2, P285
[9]   Measurement error and the relationship between investment and q [J].
Erickson, T ;
Whited, TM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 108 (05) :1027-1057
[10]   INFLATION, TAX RULES AND INVESTMENT - SOME ECONOMETRIC EVIDENCE [J].
FELDSTEIN, M .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (04) :825-862