Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research

被引：1192

作者：

Armijo-Olivo, Susan ^{[2
]}

Stiles, Carla R. ^{[3
]}

Hagen, Neil A. ^{[4
,5
,6
,7
]}

Biondo, Patricia D. ^{[3
]}

Cummings, Greta G. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada

[2] Univ Alberta, Res Ctr, Fac Rehabil Med, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada

[3] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Clin Trials Unit, Calgary, AB, Canada

[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada

[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Clin Neurosci, Calgary, AB, Canada

[6] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada

[7] Alberta Hlth Serv Canc Care, Tom Baker Canc Ctr, Calgary, AB, Canada

来源：

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE | 2012年 / 18卷 / 01期

基金：

加拿大健康研究院;

关键词：

instruments; methodological research; quality assessment; systematic reviews; CANCER PAIN MANAGEMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SELF-CARE INTERVENTION; EDUCATION-PROGRAM; PATIENT; METAANALYSES; KNOWLEDGE; BARRIERS; OUTCOMES; SCALES;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background The Cochrane Collaboration is strongly encouraging the use of a newly developed tool, the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (CCRBT), for all review groups. However, the psychometric properties of this tool to date have yet to be described. Thus, the objective of this study was to add information about psychometric properties of the CCRBT including inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity, in comparison with the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP).

引用

页码：12 / 18

页数：7

共 53 条

[1] Pain education for underserved minority cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial [J].

Anderson, KO ;

Mendoza, TR ;

Payne, R ;

Valero, V ;

Palos, GR ;

Nazario, A ;

Richman, SP ;

Hurley, J ;

Gning, I ;

Lynch, GR ;

Kalish, D ;

Cleeland, CS .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (24) :4918-4925

[2] How good is that agreement? [J].

Byrt, T .

EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (05) :561-561

[3] BIAS IN TREATMENT ASSIGNMENT IN CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].

CHALMERS, TC ;

CELANO, P ;

SACKS, HS ;

SMITH, H .

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (22) :1358-1361

[4] Longitudinal documentation of cancer pain management outcomes: A pilot study at a VA medical center [J].

Chang, VT ;

Hwang, SS ;

Kasimis, B .

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 24 (05) :494-505

[5]

Clotfelter C E, 1999, Oncol Nurs Forum, V26, P27

[6] Impact of quality scales on levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of exercise therapy and low back pain [J].

Colle, F ;

Rannou, F ;

Revel, M ;

Fermanian, J ;

Poiraudeau, S .

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 83 (12) :1745-1752

[7]

Cummings G. G., 2008, COCHRANE DB SYST REV

[8] EDUCATION FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT - A PILOT-STUDY [J].

DALTON, JA .

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1987, 9 (02) :155-165

[9] From hospital to home care: a randomized controlled trial of a Pain Education Programme for cancer patients with chronic pain [J].

de Wit, R ;

van Dam, F .

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 36 (06) :742-754

[10] Improving the quality of pain treatment by a tailored pain education programme for cancer patients in chronic pain [J].

de Wit, R ;

van Dam, F ;

Loonstra, S ;

Zandbelt, L ;

van Buuren, A ;

van der Heijden, K ;

Leenhouts, G ;

Duivenvoorden, H ;

Abu-Saad, HH .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2001, 5 (03) :241-256

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →