Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness

被引:919
作者
Barrick, MR
Stewart, GL
Neubert, MJ
Mount, MK
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Business Adm, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Owen Grad Sch Management, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Six hundred fifty-two employees composing 51 work teams participated in a study examining relationships among team composition (ability and personality), team process (social cohesion), and team outcomes (team viability and team performance). Mean, variance, minimum, and maximum were 4 scoring methods used to operationalize the team composition variables to capture the team members' characteristics. With respect to composition variables, teams higher in general mental ability (GMA), conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, and emotional stability received higher supervisor ratings for team performance. Teams higher in GMA, extraversion, and emotional stability received higher supervisor ratings for team viability. Results also show that extraversion and emotional stability were associated with team viability through social cohesion. Implications and future research needs are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 391
页数:15
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[2]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[3]  
BARRICK MR, 1995, UNPUB PERSONAL CHARA
[4]   Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality [J].
Barry, B ;
Stewart, GL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :62-78
[5]   GROUP STANDARDS, COHESIVENESS, AND PRODUCTIVITY [J].
Berkowitz, Leonard .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1954, 7 (04) :509-519
[6]   5 YEARS OF GROUPS RESEARCH - WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED AND WHAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED [J].
BETTENHAUSEN, KL .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (02) :345-381
[7]   PERSONALITY PROBLEM-SOLVING PROCEDURE AND PERFORMANCE IN SMALL GROUPS [J].
BOUCHARD, TJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 53 (1P2) :1-&
[8]   RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS [J].
CAMPION, MA ;
MEDSKER, GJ ;
HIGGS, AC .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (04) :823-850
[9]   Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension [J].
Campion, MA ;
Papper, EM ;
Medsker, GJ .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (02) :429-452
[10]   CONCEPTS AND METHODS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF GROUP SYNTALITY [J].
CATTELL, RB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1948, 55 (01) :48-63