One Concept, Many Opinions: How Scientists in Germany Think About the Concept of Bioeconomy

被引:13
|
作者
Priefer, Carmen [1 ,2 ]
Meyer, Rolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Technol Assessment & Syst Anal ITAS, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Max Rubner Inst, Fed Res Inst Nutr & Food, Dept Nutr Behav, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
bioeconomy; survey; strategies; research program; biogas; lignocellulose; microalgae; ECONOMY; INNOVATION; VISIONS; EUROPE;
D O I
10.3390/su11154253
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The official bioeconomy strategies in Europe and Germany pursue a technology-based implementation pathway and stipulate a wide range of objectives to be achieved with a bio-based economy. Reviews of the scientific and societal debate have shown that the technology fix meets criticism and that there is a controversial discussion about possible ways to shape the transition process. Against this background, an online survey was carried out among scientists involved in a regional bioeconomy research program in southern Germany in order to gain insight into their understanding of a bioeconomy. Moreover, the survey provides information about cooperation and major challenges in the future development of three biomass utilization pathways: biogas, lignocellulose, and microalgae. The analysis showed that a resource-oriented understanding of a bioeconomy is favored. The political objectives for a European bioeconomy are widely accepted, and it is expected that ongoing research can significantly contribute to achieving these goals. The two different pathways for shaping the bioeconomy that are discussed in the debate-the technology-based approach and the socio-ecological approach-are considered compatible rather than contrary. Up to now, scientific cooperation has prevailed, while cooperation with societal stakeholders and end-users has played a minor role.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring the importance of the bioeconomy in Germany: Concept and illustration
    Efken, Josef
    Dirksmeyer, Walter
    Kreins, Peter
    Knecht, Marius
    NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2016, 77 : 9 - 17
  • [2] The doctrine of legal custom: the concept and opinions of scientists
    Kovalenko, Kseniya
    DILEMAS CONTEMPORANEOS-EDUCACION POLITICA Y VALORES, 2019, 7
  • [3] TRANSFERENCE - ONE CONCEPT OR MANY
    EHRENREICH, JH
    PSYCHOANALYTIC REVIEW, 1989, 76 (01): : 37 - 65
  • [4] Polycentricity - one concept or many?
    Rauhut, Daniel
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2017, 25 (02) : 332 - 348
  • [5] WHY SCIENTISTS ARE 'SCEPTICAL' ABOUT THE AGW CONCEPT
    Rorsch, Arthur
    Ziegler, Peter A.
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 24 (3-4) : 551 - 559
  • [6] One and many. Think about Europe
    Malucchi, Mary
    IRIDE-FILOSOFIA E DISCUSSIONE PUBBLICA, 2011, 24 (01): : 213 - 214
  • [7] Liberty - One concept too many?
    Nelson, E
    POLITICAL THEORY, 2005, 33 (01) : 58 - 78
  • [8] Apprenticeship: one concept, many facets
    Smith, Erica
    EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2016, 58 (06): : 566 - +
  • [9] Preservice chemistry teachers' opinions about drawing concept map
    Turan, Nurcan
    Ekmekci, Guler
    3RD WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES - 2011, 2011, 15 : 681 - 684
  • [10] Conference "Theory of negotiation: One concept, many concepts"
    Mares, Jakub
    SOCIOLOGICKY CASOPIS-CZECH SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 43 (04): : 862 - 865